Answer:
A) The Heckscher-Ohlin model offers a reasonable explanation of the pattern of trade and the gains from trade.
Explanation:
A) The Heckscher-Ohlin model mentions that some countries have capital products and some have labor work products. In that condition some countries might be producing capital products like cars and mobile phones however these countries might have less labor work products like agricultural products so that they can not produce enough food. In that sense there is a trade that occurs between two countries one having a capital like a car and others having a high food production so the trade gets balance thanks to this import and export of products. Basically, each country exports its products that they are leading whether it has capital good or labor work good and imports goods that they are lack of it whether it is capital or labor work products. Well, gains from trade happens thanks to this exchange.
B) No, the Heckscher-Ohlin model offers a pattern of trade between two countries according to capital goods and labor work products.
C) No, the Heckscher-Ohlin model explains the gain. Possible to gain from your goods. If a country produces capital good then gains from that or produce labor work good then gains from it by export to other countries that they have lack of that good.
D) The Ricardian trade model focuses only on labor work goods but Heckscher-Ohlin states that trade based on labor work goods and capital goods.
Answer:
Influence.
Explanation:
One of the most important thing for an organization is their workforce or employees.An organization is known by it's employees.So it is necessary to keep the employees happy,and motivated so that they can achieve organization's goals.
Managers have these leadership qualities so that they can influence the members of the organization by motivating and inspiring them.
Answer:
$8,000
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Average cost of car = $25,000
Now,
Using the class recovery system of five years,
The rate of depreciation expense in year 2 of the MACRS is 32%
Therefore,
The depreciation expense in the year 2 will be
= Average cost of car × Rate of depreciation
= $25,000 × 32%
or
The depreciation expense in the year 2 = $8,000
it expanded in cotton sales, if that's the time period u are speaking of...
Question (in proper order)
If the simple CAPM is valid and all portfolios are priced correctly, which of the situations below is possible? Consider each situation independently, and assume the risk-free rate is 5%.
A)
Portfolio Expected Return Beta
A 11 % 1.1
Market 11 % 1.0
B)
Portfolio Expected Return Standard Deviation
A 14 % 11 %
Market 9 % 19 %
C)
Portfolio Expected Return Beta
A 14 % 1.1
Market 9 % 1.0
D)
Portfolio Expected Return Beta
A 17.6 % 2.1
Market 11 % 1.0
Option A
Option B
Option C
Option D
Answer and Explanation:
A) As Per CAPM
Expected Return = Risk free rate + Beta × (Market Return - Risk free Rate)
= 5% + 1.1 × (11% - 5%)
= 11.60%
(Portfolio is not correctly Priced)
B) Standard Deviation alone cannot determine expected return using CAPM
C) As Per CAPM
Expected Return = Risk free rate + Beta × (Market Return - Risk free Rate)
= 5% + 1.1 × (9% - 5%) = 9.40%
(Portfolio is not correctly Priced)
D) As Per CAPM
Expected Return = Risk free rate + Beta × (Market Return - Risk free Rate)
= 5% + 2.1 × (11% - 5%) = 17.60%
Required Rate and Expected Return of Portfolio are Same
(Portfolio is correctly Priced)
Option D is correct option
