The answer for this question is 36
Fifteen thousand, four hundred and nine
This ones kinda hard I'm not really sure, but looking at the table, when f(x) = 1, g(x) = 1. So therefore it is yes, and Im guessing you know the negative and positive x coordinates/zero thing, so I think you should be correct. Sorry if this is wrong, not too sure, but hopefully it gives you a better idea.
9514 1404 393
Answer:
y -2 = -2/3(x +4)
Step-by-step explanation:
There are several different forms of the equation for a line. Each is useful in its own way. Here, the line crosses the y-axis at a point between integer values, so using that intercept point could be problematical. That suggests the "point-slope" form of the equation for a line would be a better choice.
That form is ...
y -k = m(x -h) . . . . . . . line with slope m through point (h, k)
__
The two marked points are (-4, 2) and (5, -4). All we need is the slope.
The slope is given by the formula ...
m = (y2 -y1)/(x2 -x1) . . . . . . . . where the given points are (x1, y1) and (x2, y2)
m = (-4 -2)/(5 -(-4)) = -6/9 = -2/3
Using the first point, the equation for the line can now be written as ...
y -2 = -2/3(x -(-4))
y -2 = -2/3(x +4)