Answer: c. Sydney can diversify 50% of her WillCo stock.
Explanation:
Employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) is simply referred to as an employee benefit where the employees of a particular company are given ownership interest as long as some certain criteria are met.
Once the workers become qualified participants, they can diversify certain percentage of their stocks. From the 1st-5th year, a qualified participant is allowed to diversify about 25% of his or her stock account and about 50% in the 6th year.
Based on the explanation, since Sydney has worked for WillCo for the last 20 years, Sydney can diversify 50% of her WillCo stock.
Answer:
3.76 times
Explanation:
The computation of the asset turnover is shown below:
Asset turnover = Net sales ÷ Average total assets
= $1,356,504 ÷ $360,600
= 3.76 times
By dividing the net sales from the average total assets, the asset turnover could arrive i.e 3.76 times
This is the answer but the same is not provided in the given options
Answer: A. deferred and recognized as income over the term of the lease.
Explanation:
In a sale-leaseback transaction, that is when a property is sold by a company and leased back, the property seller is the lessee and the property purchase is the lessor. In this case, a sale-leaseback will allow a company to sell an asset so that the company can raise capital, after which the asset can then be leader back.
When a company sells property and then leases it back, any gain on the sale should usually be deferred and recognized as income over the term of the lease.
When some one or something solves the problem
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": Neither Italy or New Zealand.
Explanation:
Comparative advantage is the ability of an individual or organization to manufacture its products at a lower opportunity cost than its competitors. The scenario does not imply the individual has an absolute advantage. It actually means it sacrifices less to achieve that goal.
Thus, <em>Portugal has a lower opportunity cost than Italy in producing a bottle of wine. Portugal's opportunity cost is 1/2 while Italy's opportunity cost is 2. Neither Italy or New Zealand (or any other country not mentioned in the example) has a comparative advantage in producing wine</em>.
