Answer:
$9,3
Explanation:
COST RETAIL RATIO
Inventory, May 1 $10,440 $14,500 .72
Purchases 31,550 42,900
Freight-in 2,000
Purchase discounts
(250)
Net markups 3,400
Net markdowns (1,300)
Totals excluding beginning inventory
33,300 45,000 .74
Goods available $43,740 59,500
Sales (46,500)
Inventory, May 31 $13,000
Estimated inventory, May 31
($13,000 × .72) $ 9,360
it's mostly custumer service most of the time of take care of that mostly ok
Answer:
5.62%
13.75%
Explanation:
According to the DDM method,
the value of a stock = [dividend x ( 1 + growth rate)] / [cost of equity - growth rate]
67 = 0.4(1.05) / r - 0.05
multiply both sides of the equation by r -0.05
67(r - 0.05) = 0.42
divide both sides of the equation by 67
r - 0.05 = 0.006269
r = 0.0563
= 5.63%
b. the cost of equity using the capm method =
risk free rate of return + beta x ( expected return - risk free return)
5% + 1.25 x (12 - 5) = 13.75%
The circumstance is called Conflict of Interest. It is a circumstance in which a man or association is engaged with various interests, money related or else, one of which could degenerate the inspiration or basic leadership of that individual or association.
Answer: No. It does not violate Title VII if Cynthia's employer does not grant her the leave.
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Cynthia, requested a two-week leave from her employer to go on a religious pilgrimage and that the pilgrimage was not a requirement of her religion, but Cynthia felt it was a calling from God.
Based on the scenario, Title VII is not violated if Cynthia's employer does not grant her the leave. According to the court, when an employee says that based on his or her religious belief, he or she is required to go to a pilgrimage, the person has to prove beyond reasonable doubt.
In this case, her church which is the Roman Catholic didn't call for a pilgrimage as it was her personal choice. Therefore, Title VII is not violated if Cynthia's employer does not grant her the leave.
