The reason why the Kantian deontology may be a potential problem is the fact that People can sometimes be treated as objects.
<h3>What is Kantian Deontology?</h3>
This Deontology was by the philosopher that is known as Immanuel Kant. The Deontology principle uses rules in order to establish what is right and what is wrong.
The potential problem is that humans may be treated as the means to an end here.
Read more on the deontology principle here:
brainly.com/question/26038204
The criminal offense of contempt of Congress sets the penalty at not less than one month nor more than twelve months in jail and a fine of not more than $100,000 or less than $100.
Considering the legal practice and standards, it is <u>false</u> that in a case involving internet transactions, jurisdiction is proper only when the defendant conducts substantial business in the jurisdiction online.
<h3>What is Jurisdiction in online transactions?</h3>
Jurisdiction online transaction is a legal issue that seeks to solve or justify court jurisdiction over a case or dispute involving a foreign defendant.
In this case, the normal principle state that having a foreign defendant access a website is not satisfactory to establish jurisdiction.
Therefore, for a court to justify exercising jurisdiction over a foreign defendant in Internet-based transactions, there must be multiple contacts in addition to the accessibility of a website.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "False."
Learn more about Jurisdiction of court here: brainly.com/question/10377896