1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mestny [16]
2 years ago
10

the economic difference between the north and the south that lead to the start of the American Civil War.

History
1 answer:
luda_lava [24]2 years ago
5 0
The South could produce all the food it needed, though transporting it to soldiers and civilians was a major problem. The South also had a great nucleus of trained officers. Seven of the eight military colleges in the country were in the South. The South also proved to be very resourceful.

Hope it helps you
You might be interested in
7. Lydia made a bad decision one night and decided to rob a bank. In the process, the bank manager had a heart attack, died on t
Marysya12 [62]

Answer:

The six amendment

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What is the best explanation for the fact that latinos have tended to favor democratic party candidates in national elections?
MAXImum [283]
Latinos have historically favored the Democratic Party primarily because of the following (this list is not designed to be exhaustive or the final word on the subject, rather this answer is a jumping off point for analysis and review and debate):
1.  Large voting blocks of perennial migrant Latino labor from Texas to California - think of the AFL-CIO coming into power in the 30's at the height of the Depression which was then legitimized by FDR as an authoritative voice of the previously voiceless - Farm Laborers as opposed to Farm Owners (Owner being predominantly conservative and Republican) and this came about during the 4 term and decade plus spanning Presidential Administration of FDR (Democrat) and then also the protection and support to migrant farm labor groups of the 60's via the policies of both JFK (Democrat) and LBJ (Democrat) - Presidents who unabashedly supported the inclusion of marginalized people and the ideal that all are created equal and refused to endorse or uphold the segregation of various races and cultures in the United States.

2. Catholicism.  JFK (Democrat) was the first Catholic President of the United States.  Latinos are OVERWHELMINGLY Catholic.  JFK blazed a trail through the WASP (White Anglo Saxon Protestant) Elite that had traditionally lead, ran, and administered the powerful offices of our great nation while mainly excluding everyone else who wasn't in the "WASP club".  He appointed exceedingly well qualified but heretofore traditionally marginalized individuals who while being mainly ignored in "Mainstream" America, were however simultaneously dynamic Leaders in their own communities.  JFK placed never before seen colors, races, religions, and creeds into positions of power and influence and VISIBILITY.  The groups and communities he championed included but were not limited to blacks, asians, latinos, women, liberals, jews, and catholics and JFK placed them into every level of the nation's administration from Ambassadors, to Federal Judges, to Cabinet Ministers, to Federal Department Heads, and the list goes on.  He didn't just invite them to the party - he took them "three times 'round the dance floor" - these people were not "Tokens" they were "Trailblazers" and that made all the difference in the world - he wasn't trying to appease anyone; he was championing what it meant to be AMERICAN by producing American leaders who could and then did lead all faiths, creeds, and colors in their secular communities to which JFK appointed them.  Catholicism has traditionally practiced inclusion, rather than exclusion, as a basic tenet of faith.  Socially, Catholics (and especially Irish Catholics) were dismissed and often viewed with contempt by the WASP establishment - for instance only a very few (a minority of minorites so to speak) catholics, jews, and differing ethnic groups were allowed into the Ivy Leagues which then put them on the correct trajectory for state, national, and international leadership in business, academia, government, medicine, and law but they would never have enough "outsiders" to make a serious play towards leadership of the leadership - limited inclusion is a way of controlling groups that are excluded - basically the WASP establishment could pick leaders for the groups they excluded and by doing so CONTROL ALL GROUPS.  In point of fact the University of Notre Dame in Indiana became the way to provide an Ivy League education and IVY LEAGUE STATUS to the children of wealthy Catholics.)  It's important to remember that in the 19 aughts, teens, and twenties it was not uncommon to have help wanted signs put up that would state: No Coloreds or Irish need apply.  JFK was born into EXTRAORDINARY privilege: wealth, status, looks, intellect, charisma but he was always looked down upon by people who did not possess what he did - they did this because of their prejudice against Catholics and Irish Americans.  When he championed people who were excluded because of heritage or faith, he did so from a place of PERSONAL understanding that was informed by HIS heritage and HIS Catholicism.  He called Americans to share his view, his exuberance, his confidence, his INCLUSION OF ALL AMERICANS into the fantastic tapestry he was weaving - JFK called to American's BEST NATURES and they answered in staggering numbers - the price for admission to this party was that they had to leave old hates and prejudices outside - no room in his "(Democratic)Party" for haters.  They, in turn, passed it onto their children.  And those children, have now passed it onto their children, and so on.  Now Latinos are Democrats because it is tied up with their faith, their heritage, their culture, and their inclusion.  In other words, it is now a part of their IDENTITY and it informs who they want to be and who they will become.  And finally, will it make their parents and grandparents proud?
7 0
3 years ago
How did world events affect American society? How did Americans respond to economic and social turmoil?
Setler [38]

Answer:

After WWI Americans treated Europeans and everything affiliated with them as demonetizing.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
An important event which took place, before the city-state of Ur rose to power.
saveliy_v [14]

Answer: The death of Sargon helped Ur rise to power

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best explains why trade among the colonies fourished?
arlik [135]
9. Which of the following is a mental benefit of exercise
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does a negative feedback work?
    8·1 answer
  • Muhammad died before the birth of Christ.<br><br> True<br> False
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following would be considered an example of logrolling? A. lobbyists securing spending policies that benefit their
    14·2 answers
  • During the time of president Andrew Jackson,which group in the United States gained suffrage
    8·2 answers
  • Who took over Rome after Caesar's death?
    6·1 answer
  • How did conditions in germany and europe at the end of world war i contribute to the rise and triumph of nazism in germany?
    5·1 answer
  • Syria’s strong influence on Lebanon ceased after 1990.<br><br> True<br><br> False
    8·1 answer
  • Can someone Help me please
    11·1 answer
  • Which is the outermost skin of the earth?:
    8·1 answer
  • Why were German military leaders confident of a victory on the Western Front at the end of 1917?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!