Okay. I will list all the relatively prime numbers up to 331.
2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19,23,29,31,37,41,43,47,53,59,61,67,71,73,79,83,89,97,101, 103,107,109,113,127,131,137, 139, 149, 151, 157, 163, 167, 173, 179, 181, 191, 193, 197, 199, 211, 223, 227, 229, 233, 239, 241, 251, 257, 263, 269, 271, 277, 281, 283, 293, 307, 311, 313, 317, 331.
Okay, so look at this list and see which match up.
For A. 102 and 312. Neither of these numbers are relatively prime.
For B. 10 and 45. Neither of these are relatively prime.
For C. 3 and 51. 3 is a relatively prime number, 51 is not.
For D. 35 and 72. Neither of these are relatively prime numbers.
But the answer would be D. because to get a relatively prime pair of numbers you have to have both of them not be divisible by the same number. 102 and 312 can be divided 2, so that's not the answer. 10 and 45 can be divided by 5, so that is incorrect. 3 and 51 can be divided by 3, so that is also incorrect. 35 and 72 cannot be divided by the same numbers.
So, the answer is D. 35 and 72.
Plot the equation. If you wish to solve a polynomial, let y= polynomial and plot the graph. Best set up a table of values first.
Where the graph crosses the x axis there is a solution for x. There are also solutions for other horizontal lines (y values) by looking at intersections of the graph with these lines. This technique works for linear and non linear equations. You can also use graphs to solve 2-variable systems of equations by examining where the graphs intersect one another. The disadvantage is that you may not be able to have sufficient detail for high degrees of accuracy because of the scale of the graph and drawing inaccuracies.
Answer:
The solution set for the inequality is the interval (-4, 5)
Step-by-step explanation:
-8 < 8 + 4x < 28
Subtracting 8:
-8 -8 < 8 + 4x - 8 < 28 - 8
-16 < 4x < 20
Dividing by 4:
-16/4 < 4x/4 < 20/4
-4 < x < 5
x ∈ (-4, 5)