Answer:
Occupy movement could be explained through Durkheimn's Functionalism theory and Karl Marx's Conflict theory.
Studying collective behavior it could be stated that there is a collective conscience that condemns and punishes Occupy's actions and behaviors. Due to they could be considered deviant or criminal, offending this collective conscience, Durkheim would consider the Occupy movement as a "social fact". The movement would support Durkheim's theory as a social force because it is external to the individual.
This collective conscience can evolve to organic solidarity, and in the long run, there could be anomie, while the whole society no longer supports a collective consciousness in favor of what Wall Street stands for.
This change in collective conscience could be reflected in education, due to there would not be a single and unique collective conscience taught to all the students. This organic process derived from the division of labor is also shown on a full-range diversity of interests and, therefore, of interdependent students alienated from each other with singular perspectives about the Occupy movement.
Marx would support the last phenomenon as an example of a society splitting up into hostile classes facing each other. Alienation could be referred to as several students isolated from their society and competing among themselves. Another result of alienation is false consciousness, where beliefs, ideals or ideologies are not in the person's own best interest. These beliefs, ideas or ideologies are also present in an educational proposal that may not fit the individual's interests.
Answer:
The majority of the Founding Fathers were originally Federalists. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and many others can all be considered Federalists. These Federalists felt that the Articles of Confederation had been too weak to sustain a working government and had decided that a new form of government was needed.
Explanation:
A shorter answer for this is he wanted a stronger state government. (B) I hope this helps you! :)
Flashback i think
mark me brainliest if i’m correct
What sentence?
try coping and pasting the whole question on here
Answer:
Growth becomes pale and development far from the environment.
Explanation:
For there to be any form of development in a society or residents, there has to be an allowable form of freedom from some evil practices. An example is security. No business can thrive in an environment that is not secure, this would make investors take their money elsewhere to a safer location, than build their business there and burglars come to attack it or prevent it's client from operating freely in the location the business was planted. Another example is unfair consideration of cost of items which are sold, especially of the cost of the product or service is way more over the quality of the product or service, this would hinder growth of the society, as individuals residing won't enjoy the extortion they are being made to pay from.
<em><u>Hope</u></em><em><u> this</u></em><em><u> helps</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>