The correct answer is "Criterion validity."
The option that determines this relationship is <em>criterion validity.</em>
When using criterion validity, Patagonia tries to assess a potential employee’s capability within the standards of the organization. The managers of the company want to determine how well they predict a potential employee’s actual job performance based on scores on the employee’s selection procedure.
This statistical method -criteria validity- tries to identify how well a measure validates or predicts an outcome of another measure. In a company, the Human Resources Department applies this test to a candidate as part of the interview mechanism to confirm that he/she would be the right candidate for the job.
Answer:
Listens to both parties and comes to a decision both of them will agree on.
Explanation:
It is a binding process, which means the parties won't have to proceed to court. The arbitrator is generally a retired judge but it is typical for both parties to choose an arbitrator and then both of those arbitrators choose a third arbitrator.
Every decision is made through a majority vote.
