The below statements are what I believe about removing Monuments
- Why are we moving them (AKA taking them down)?
Are we just moving it for room? Why are we moving it? For room, for a building, is that honorable? No, I don't think it is
- Are we really thinking about the monuments use
If were removing a monument that has a significant meaning or remembrance of something, than that's disrespectful and why did we put it up in the first place
- Do the people like it, or not?
This kind of relates to the first answer. Are we just moving it to put in a building or something like that. If the government has decided to remove it, are they thinking about if the people like it?
There are my answers. Best of luck,
- Ari -
Answer: B. African slaves
Explanation:
After the European impact on the cultural Latin American region, African slaves had the second most impact. Because Europeans had many slaves, and they had many in Latin America, slaves had a high impact.
The answer to the question is African slaves.
The answer to this question is "Transcendence". In the stages of change model, TRANSCENDENCE means a person no longer requires conscious attention to maintain the new lifestyle and a healthy behavior. This is when the person has fully recovered from his or her illness and transcendence has been achieved. This commonly occurred in the maintenance stage of the model.
"At first the Romans pretended to let Greece be independent, but by 146 BC the Romans destroyed Corinth and made Greece into a province of the Roman Empire Greece did well under Roman rule, even though some Greeks- especially the rich ones who had been more important before - were not very happy about it"
Durkheim was interested in suicide primarily because he wanted to b) show that what was thought to be a personal act was patterned by social forces.
A lot of social factors may be the cause of a person’s decision to perform suicide. For example, a person that is a victim of bullying may decide to end his/her life because of sheer depression.
