Solution:
<u>Note that:</u>
- Given equation: 4(k + 1) = k + 10
- To find: 3k
<u>Simplifying the LHS:</u>
- 4(k + 1) = k + 10
- => (4 x k) + (4 x 1) = k + 10
- => 4k + 4 = k + 10
<u>Subtracting k and 4 both sides:</u>
- 4k + 4 - k - 4 = k + 10 - k - 4
- => 3k = 6 (No further solution required)
The value of 3k is 6.
Answer:
4/5
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
15. 6647.61
16. 553
Step-by-step explanation:
First, you drive 123km per day, and they ask for in a week.
There are 7 days in a week, we have to multiply 123 by 7, which equals 861.
=km per week 861
Now, we need to find out how much cost the gas. Gas cost 1.10 euros per-liter, and this problem wants us to assume that 1euro = 1.26 dollars.
So, we divide 1.10 by 1.26 which is 0.87.
=gas cost 0.87 per liter.
Next, this person goes 31.0 mi/gal per stop.
To get the answer we need to divide 861 the full distance in a week and divide it by how many stops nee to be made which is each 31 mi/gal.
So, 861/31 = 27.77 and now we times 0.87 by 27.77 to get gas cost.
=24.16
<h3>
Answer: Choice B</h3>
No, this is not a plausible value for the population mean, because 5 is not within the 95% confidence interval.
====================================================
Explanation:
The greek letter mu is the population mean. It has the symbol
which looks like the letter 'u' but with a tail at the front or left side.
The question is asking if mu = 5 is plausible if the researcher found the 95% confidence interval to be 5.2 < mu < 7.8
We see that 5 is <u>not</u> in that interval. It's a bit to the left of 5.2
Since mu = 5 is not in the interval, it's not a plausible value for the population mean.
Have we ruled it out with 100% confidence? No. Such a thing is not possible. There's always room for (slight) error. The researcher would need to do a census to be fully confident; however, such practices are very time consuming and expensive. This is the main reason why statistics is important to try to estimate the population with a sample.