The correct answer is B. The described experiment meets or exceeds the standards of good science.
Explanation:
In science, it is common after research scientists publish information about the process and results in scientific papers or articles. Additionally, the credibility and reliability of this documents and of the research itself depend on multiple factors and one of this is whether the paper has been review by another expert in the field which called peer-reviewed paper. Indeed papers that have gone through the peer-review process are more credible and therefore more value by other scientists as in general terms this guarantees the results can be believed as each step in the research fits with the standards of good science because the scientists who reviewed the paper approve it. Therefore, the reason a scientist value a peer-reviewed paper is that the escribed experiment meets or exceeds the standards of good science.
The teacher most likely asked for additional trials because it was necessary to see data from more plants before the conclusion could be accepted.
Explanation:
Any experiment should have multiple trials given so that accuracy of the result could be obtained.
Repeating same experiments tests the consistency of a particular result and makes sure that the results will not be effected by random events occurring within the system or surrounding.
Thus the conclusion becomes more precise and accurate.
