While you didn't really provide the "following" as the comment above me states, in general, the advantage of secondary sources of primary ones is that they perhaps provide a more objective or even just a broader view on a certain topic. While a primary source of the American civil war would be a letter written by a soldier, a secondary source would be a book that describes more letters taken together and discusses possible information regarding them.
The lotus and the papyrus plants<span>, for instance, were (and are) very common in Egypt. Papyrus is a kind of reed which </span>grows<span> in wetlands </span>along<span> the banks of the </span>Nile River<span>. Date palms </span>grew<span> all over Egypt, and other palms that people used to make palm oil. Hoped this helped</span>
Answer:
Constitution states that the president “shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient.”
New York Times vs The United States was a legal case in which the Supreme Court ultimately ruled in favor of the newspaper to publish classified Pentagon papers without the risk of being censored by the government. President Nixon, relying on executive authority, attempted to force The New York Times into not publishing the documents.
The court based its decision on the first amendment of the Constitution, which prevented the government to create laws that would censor the right of freedom of speech of the citizens.
I think the first one is "paper assets" and the second one "derivates". I'm not 100% sure though.
