Answer:
Is the proposed action legal?
Explanation:
The very first step in the decision tree (below) was ignored. Disregarding local laws is ignoring the question of legality.
Answer:
Explanation:
1. True
Separation of record keeping for assets from custody over assets in custody over assets reduces theft and fraud . except in a case of collusion.
Fraud and theft of assets can be easily perpetrated and covered up when an individual combines the role.
2. False
Internal control focuses more on the internal operation of an organization rather than the external. Even though it can still be of impact in checking the excesses of external parties like the government agencies , but that is not its primary objective
3.True
Internal control's main objectives can be best accomplished when there is an operational system with managerial policies that protect waste , fraud and theft , being the major factors targeted to control
4.False
Separating the responsibility for a transaction between two or more individuals or departments is a major way of preventing creation of fictitious invoices and payment as it could have easily be detected if different individuals are involved in approval and payment of invoices.
Answer:
A. Undue influence
Explanation:
Undue influence in law of contract is when a person uses his or her position of power to take advantage over another person. It is an act of influencing the other party in a contractual relationship. There must be a relationship between both parties before undue influence can take place.
In law of contract, if a person is a victim of undue influence, the person has the right to rescind the contract provided same can be proven in a court of law.
Example of undue influence is when a person is not given parts of properties due to him or her in a family's will, whereas he or she is entitled to it.
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
The investor should consider that they may find that the restaurant's financial statements undervalue the true value of its resources. If this were to be the case then the investor would have made a lot of money since they would have paid face value for the restaurant when in actuality it was massively undervalued and is worth a lot more, meaning he would make a large profit on his investment from the beginning.
"<span>Store Within A Store"</span>
