1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
geniusboy [140]
2 years ago
15

©

Social Studies
1 answer:
Olenka [21]2 years ago
4 0

The radical republicans wanted to severely punish the South for causing the Civil War. They demanded harsher restrictions for the Former confederates who wanted to rejoin Congress.

<h3>What was Radical republicans?</h3>

From the Civil War through the time of Reconstruction, a section of the Republican Party called the Radical Republicans comprised of a number of politicians.

The Radicals were renowned for their resistance to enslavement, their work to achieve Black people's freedom and civil rights, and their passionate views on post-war Reconstruction.

Southern states were obliged to present state constitutions that approved the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments as part of their applications for readmission to the Union. Grant continued to maintain army throughout the former Confederacy.

Therefore, the correct answer is Radical republicans and  Former confederates.

Learn more about Radical republicans, here:

brainly.com/question/27843116

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Why would you not expect to find live plants or photosynthetic plankton in the deep-water zone of a lake?
svetlana [45]

Answer:

there is no sun

Explanation:

plants and organisms need the sun to produce there food.

8 0
3 years ago
The temprature in nepal goes on decreasing from south to north. Why?​
Art [367]
North because north is colder than the south
7 0
3 years ago
Eighteen-year-old Alisha was driving through her neighborhood one afternoon and recognized six-year-old Timmy, a member of the C
Tcecarenko [31]

The correct answer is no.

Alisha was under no obligation to help Timmy, <em>there is no such thing like</em> <em>duty to rescue.</em> There is no legal requirement in the United States to help and rescue someone who is in danger. Even in extreme situation, when a person sees a person falling into a river for example, the witness of the situation is no obliged to assist with help.

There are some cases with some important exceptions: if the defendant created the peril he is obliged to come to the plaintiff's aid, if the defendant started to rescue the plaintiff, he must continue to do so, if the defendant is in a special relationship with the plaintiff ( teacher-student, worker-employer), he is under duty to rescue him.

Alisha was under no duty to inform Timmy's parents of the danger facing him <em>but she should have done it nevertheless.</em> She should at least have phoned them if she didn't have the time to stop by. She knew the boy well and she should have cared more. The need to help the boy should have come from her moral guidance and not as a sense of duty to be performed.

3 0
3 years ago
What was a main idea behind the American Revolutionary War?
lord [1]

Answer:

Multiple causes took place that eventually caused many colonists to go against Great Britain.

Explanation:

By 1774, the year leading up to the Revolutionary War, there were many causes that continued to pile up. Parliament had been passing laws placing taxes on the colonists in America. There had been the Sugar Act in 1764, the Stamp Act the following year, and a variety of other laws that were meant to get money from the colonists for Great Britain. The colonists didn't like these laws.

Great Britain was passing these laws because of the French and Indian War, which had ended in 1763. That war, which had been fought in North America, left Great Britain with a huge debt that had to be paid. Parliament said it had fought the long and costly war to protect its American subjects from the powerful French in Canada. Parliament said it was right to tax the American colonists to help pay the bills for the war.

Most colonists disagreed. Parliament was elected by people living in England, and the colonists felt that lawmakers living in England could not understand the colonists' needs. The colonists felt that since they did not take part in voting for members of Parliament in England they were not represented in Parliament. So Parliament did not have the right to take their money by imposing taxes. "No taxation without representation" became the American rallying cry.

8 0
3 years ago
Why was the Magna Carta so influential to the Founding Fathers?
Sergeeva-Olga [200]
Im pretty sure its because it showed that kings or monarchs had a limit in power 
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which metaethical theory holds that morality is subjective and grounded in attitudes?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following best defines movement
    7·1 answer
  • PSYCHOLOGY QUESTION
    9·2 answers
  • What qualification for holding any public office is forbidden
    5·1 answer
  • How does Indians form of government contrast with the governments of Pakistan and Afghanistan?
    11·1 answer
  • Kelley hypothesized that people make causal attributions by observing: Select one: A. Effort and ability B. Consensus, distincti
    13·1 answer
  • Cómo reconocer y valorar la dignidad de la persona humana en la sociedad actual
    11·1 answer
  • In contrast to hierarchical control, decentralized control relies on: Group of answer choices extensive use of rules and policie
    14·1 answer
  • Abraham Lincoln’s Point of View of the war?<br> ASAP The Gettysburg Address
    13·1 answer
  • Which Substance is a natural land resource used in construction
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!