Answer:
The court should stick to statutory language. These days common law is being turned into statutory law.
Explanation:
The U.S. legal system were set up based on the common law, which adhered to the precedents of earlier cases as sources of law. This principle is known as stare decisis. Under stare decisis, once a court has answered the question, the same question in other cases must draw out from the same court or lower court the same response in that jurisdiction.
Stare decisis is a doctrine which has always been a major part of the common law, court should follow precedents when they established clearly, expected under compelling reasons. The doctrine of stare decisis will remain valid even more common law is being turned into statutory law. After all, statutes have to be interpreted by the courts.
There is certainly less common law governing like environmental law than there was 100 years ago. The federal and state governments are increasingly regulating the aspects of commercial transaction between merchants and consumers, when disputes arise may be the courts should stick to statutory language.
Answer:
small claims court handles cases involving property damage
Answer:
A. <u>Vehicles</u><u> </u><u>going</u><u> </u><u>in </u><u>the </u><u>direction</u><u> </u><u>of </u><u>the </u><u>arrow</u><u> </u><u>must </u><u>stop </u><u>if </u><u>they </u><u>can.</u><u> </u><u>The </u><u>arrow </u><u>will </u><u>soon</u><u> </u><u>be </u><u>red.</u>
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
The answer is "Is suggested by the Constitution, but not specifically stated."
Please mark brainlest!
Answer:
No, it shouldn't. In the present case, it is a conflict of interest between two states: the states of New York and New Jersey, with respect to Ellis Island and the inter-jurisdictional waters of the Hudson River. Therefore, due to being a controversial matter between two states, the provisions of Article III Section 2 of the United States Constitution, which establishes the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in the case. In addition, in case of recourse to the internal courts of a state, a state would be brought to litigate outside its original jurisdiction.