The acquittal of Mr. Kyle Rittenhouse, who killed two men and wounded another in a <em>riot against the killing</em> of Jacob Blake, who was protesting the police brutality against George Floyd, can only be seen as a symbol of America's racial divide.
The question is, was Mr. Rittenhouse right to carry a gun at 17 years when he was attending to keep the peace and provide medical aid to protesters? At his age then, was Mr. Rittenhouse authorized to belong to a Vigilante Group that could keep the peace in racial protests?
Thus, given Mr. Rittenhouse's age and the purpose of his presence at the scene of rioting, the verdict that acquitted him is bound to attract controversy concerning broader issues of <em>vigilantism, gun rights,</em><em> and proper definition of </em><em>self-defense</em>.
Learn more: brainly.com/question/25716779
Answer:
the congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on income, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the Sevres states, and without regard to any census or enumeration.
Explanation:
i looked it up
Answer: C
Explanation: He is not able to choose VP yet
Answer:
Within the legislative branch, each house of Congress serves as a check on possible abuses of power by the other. ... Once Congress has passed a bill, the president has the power to veto that bill. In turn, Congress can override a regular presidential veto by a two-thirds vote of both houses
Hope this helps :) -Mark Brainiest Please :)
Answer: The Court has appellate jurisdiction (the Court can hear the case on appeal) on almost any other case that involves a point of constitutional and/or federal law.
Explanation: