Answer:
Characteristics of a Trial - Jury, Evidence, Verdict. Elected by the voters or appointed by the governor of the state. Vested with the authority to listen to and decide questions of criminal and civil law. The judge supervises the trial and bears the responsibility that the parties receive a fair trial.
Explanation:
In addition to damages, the prevailing party is also entitled to costs. Costs include court filing fees and related litigation expenses. In addition to infringement damages, a patent owner may stop the infringer from continuing to produce infringing products
The US constitution resolved one weakness of the articles of confederation that was the lack of the power of the central government in the tax regulation and regulation of commerce.
What is the article of confederation?
Article of confederation was the First constitution of US which was made by the congress in order to have the national government in November 1777. This article was enacted in 1781.
Article of confederation involved with the one weakness that the central government was lacking in the power for the regulation of tax and commerce.
In order to resolve that issue they gave the second draft in which they gave freedom to all other states thus it protected their rights and gave them autonomy.
Learn more about constitution here:
brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ4
Answer:
This is an answer that requires a personal opinion. I will give you my opinion with an explanation so you can understand it and if you want, you can modify it.
Explanation:
I agree.
What this question proposes to us is that there is no absolute truth when it comes to morality.
There is no one truth about morality that applies to everyone as if it were a rule. And this happens because there are many sets of subjective norms, beliefs, values and customs that direct or guide the behavior of groups of people in society and that vary depending on each person.
Something that is moral for a certain cultural group may not be for another in another part of the world.
That is why in my personal opinion I agree that there is no objective 'truth' in morality. "
Answer:
The decision of the Supreme Court on Steagald v United States (1981) established that according to the Fourth Amendment, police officers can´t search for a suspect in a third party´s property without getting a search warrant first.
Explanation:
According to the Supreme Court, the search carried in the house of the petitioner, Gary Keith Steagald, which was conducted only with an arrest warrant for Ricky Lyons, and led to Steagald´s arrest, was a violation of the exclusionary rule stated in the Fourth Amendment that protects all citizens from illegal searches and seizures. I do agree with this decision because any effort to apprehend a suspect should never infringe nor his or a third party´s constitutional rights.
