With the first one,you're going to want to use Ethos,or the appeal to emotions,for this to work. I would say this: There is an extent to which someone can be punished. If somebody committed murder,the death penalty,or more politely called "Capital Punishment",would honestly have no effect on them. It does not truly give them a chance to dwell on their actions and how they messed up someone's life. Not only that,but you also become a murderer if an innocent man is found guilty of a murder he didn't commit,which makes you no better than a murderer. Worse in fact because at least the person who actually did kill someone did it them selves and not with an executioner. I don't support Capital punishment because that puts someone else's blood on my hands.
As for the second one...I'd say this: By nature,humans are social creatures. We desire human contact and interaction. In fact,we NEED it in order to function normally. Capital Punishment only supports the tradition of "An Eye For An Eye And A Tooth For A Tooth." If you really want to punish someone,don't kill them physically,but instead mentally and socially. If you take away someone's ability to interact with people,it causes them to think back on their mistakes and it leaves them with no other choice but to confront their bad choices. Capital Punishment gets it over with quickly with no time to repent or ask for forgiveness,but life in prison with no chance of parole unless proven mentally capable by a team of psychologists,is by far the worst punishment you could ever give someone.
Answer:
Explanation:
The term used is Vassal. Usually it is a Lord that commands the knight's loyalty.
Explanation:
Because the old greeks created the "athenian democracy" around the sixth century BC. It is a simplified version of our modern democracy. It simply says that the people of athens have the right to vote in a plebiscite. The people will decide if a choice of a politician is right or not, or if a law should be enabled.
Answer:
A) Alter its own spending, taxes, and/or the amount of money in circulation.
Explanation:
In situations of economic warming and inflation the government can act to influence citizens' spending to cool down economic activity to lower inflation. Inflation is a monetary phenomenon caused by excess currency in the economy. Thus, the government can reduce its spending, because it is an important player, which makes government consumption has a significant weight in economic warming. In addition, the government can take steps to curb citizen consumption through restrictive policies such as raising taxes. Finally, the government may sell government bonds to wipe out the monetary base. When the government sells bonds, people stop consuming at present to earn future income from public bonds. Thus, the government causes the money in circulation to decrease.
Answer:
a. If the overall unemployment rate is 6 percent, teenage unemployment rates will exceed 12 percent.
Explanation:
Positive economics refers to the description of facts and information related to the economic situation of a country or region. It simply means explaining the facts and reality that is proven by theoretical work as well. It highlights the cause and effect relationships between different economic phenomenon. Here, the statement that if the overall unemployment rate is 6 percent, teenage unemployment rates will exceed 12 percent fulfills this criteria as it presents a simple and well-known fact that teenage unemployment rates are usually higher than the overall unemployment rate and can be double. This is because of a lack of skill set and experience at the youth level as compared to older age groups.
