Well silly we would all be dead if it wasnt bonded right
I would make an educated guess to say yes because the left and right hemispheres control opposite sides of the body.
<span>Empirical studies are results of analysis of data based on actual observation or experiences in the field. When conducting an empirical study, quantitative and qualitative approaches are employed, including:</span>
<span>1. </span><span>Providing data</span>
<span>2. </span>Emphasizes features of a new condition
<span>3. </span>Describes the current status of existing condition
<span>4. </span>Highlight associations between variables, but cannot establish causality, and
<span>5. </span>Suggest hypotheses which can be tested in analytical studies
<span>Qualitative empirical studies provide deep contextual data to help us understand a situation, but it cannot be used to establish its prevalence or incidence. It cannot be generalized also to highlight the statistical relationship between variables. If the aim is to measure the relationship, the quantitative methods should be used. A cross-sectional survey with large sample size is needed to describe the who, what, and where of a situation. Still, it cannot answer the why question. In order to answer the question of "why", an analytical or experimental study is needed. Experimental error is an important consideration here considering lapses or inaccuracies in the qualitative and quantitative data. </span>
Answer:
(a) H0: mu = 17 vs. Ha: mu < 17
(b) Sample statistic is 1.6
Explanation:
(a) A null hypothesis is a statement from a population parameter which is either rejected or accepted (fail to reject) the upon testing. It is expressed using the equality sign.
An alternate hypothesis is also a statement from a population parameter which negates the null hypothesis and is accepted if the null hypothesis is rejected. It is expressed using any of the inequality signs.
(b) Sample statistic = sample mean ÷ sample size = 16 ÷ 10 = 1.6
