Answer:
Before a joint session of Congress on September 20, 2001, President Bush declared a new approach to foreign policy in response to 9/11: “Our war on terror begins with al Qaeda, but it does not end there. It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped, and defeated.” Bush declared that the United States considered any nation that supported terrorist groups a hostile regime. In his State of the Union speech in January 2002, President Bush called out an “Axis of Evil” consisting of North Korea, Iran, and Iraq, and he declared all a threat to American security. British and French allies did not receive Bush’s declaration enthusiastically because they believed Bush’s language to be overly aggressive.
These remarks later matured into the policies known as the Bush Doctrine, officially traceable to September 2002, when the White House released the National Security Strategy of the United States. The doctrine generally focused on three points. The first was preventive war in which the United States would strike an enemy nation or terrorist group before they had a chance to attack the United States. It focused on deterring any potential attacker. The second point was unilateral action in which the United States would act alone if necessary to defend itself either at home or abroad. The third point embraced spreading democracy and freedom around the world, focusing on concepts such as free markets, free trade, and individual liberty.
Reactions to the Bush Doctrine were mixed. Neoconservatives within and outside his administration strongly supported the idea of the United States acting on its own to ensure the country’s security and to protect the American people—preemptively, if necessary. Some opponents believed the doctrine was overly bellicose and its emphasis on preemptive war was unjust. Others believed the emphasis on spreading democracy around the world was naïve and unrealistic. As the situation in Iraq became increasingly unstable, the ideas behind the Bush Doctrine receded in prominence, even within the Bush administration.
Explanation:
https://millercenter.org/president/gwbush/foreign-affairs
press the link for more help
A historical account or biography written from personal knowledge
Forget about her or move on definitely don't keep pining.
Answer:
sorry but are we suppose to wrtie a paragraph
Explanation:
like rn?
<em>Adjectives</em> are the part of speech which qualifies the noun or pronoun. They may be placed before the qualifying word.
<u>For example,</u> this <em>cute</em> baby is eating an apple.
Whereas,<em> adverbs</em> refers to the set of words or word which qualifies the adjectives.
<u>For example,</u> the girls are speaking <em>softly</em>.
Hence, to form an adverb through adjective, they can be formed by adding –ly to the end of the word.
<u>For example,</u> they performed bad/badly in the exam
how did they perform? <em>badly</em>.
Hence, it is an adverb.
