So hmm notice the picture below
you're simply being asked to, approximate the area, by using 4 rectangles, like in the graph, it doesn't have to be an exact value, just an approximation, based on the width and height of the rectangles, and getting their area by that
those rectangles are 0.39 radian long, since if you split π/2 in 4 pieces, you get around that much, the last rectangle there is a bit smaller than 0.39.... but they don't have to be 4 rectangles of equal length
so, get the area of the rectangles, based on their width and height, and sum them up
You put 3 shapes together I believe
Answer:idk i cank help u
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
$290.68
Step-by-step explanation:
$3633.49 times 2 times 4% = $290.68
Answer:
Becky, because her justification for the second statement should be "definition of supplementary angles" rather than "angle addition postulate."
Step-by-step explanation:
Becky completed the proof incorrectly because her justification for the second statement is not totally correct.
Angle addition postulate does not really apply here, as the sum of 2 angles may not give you exactly 180°.
However, the second statement, m<AKG + m<GKB = 180° and m<GKB + m<HKB = 180°, can be justified by the "Definition of Supplementary Angles".
The sum of supplementary angles = 180°.
Therefore, Becky completed the proof incorrectly.