Okay the answer is Southeast Asia.
Chest Pain is the answer.
A very common ailment is chest pain. Many patients seek assessment even for minor symptoms because they are fully aware that it could be a sign of potentially fatal illnesses. Other patients, many of whom have significant illnesses, downplay or ignore these warnings. Men and women perceive pain differently than one another as well as in different ways, both in terms of type and intensity. No matter how it is presented, chest pain should never be ignored without a diagnosis.
Many illnesses result in discomfort or chest pain. These conditions may affect the nervous, musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, or neurologic systems.
To know more about Chest Pain refer:
brainly.com/question/10486652
#SPJ4
It helped the crops get watered and it helped the soil stay fertile.
Answer:
D. child learns about her world by handling different objects
Explanation:
Sensorimotor stage: Jean Piaget has given four stages of cognitive development in an individual's life. The sensorimotor stage is the first stage in Piaget's theory, which consists of six sub-stages and lasts from birth to twenty-four months of age. Throughout this period, an infant discovers the relationship between the environment and his body.
Sub-stages:
1. Reflexes.
2. Primary circular reactions.
3. Secondary circular reactions.
4. Coordination of reactions.
5. Tertiary circular reactions.
6. Early representational thought.
Answer:
Explanation:
The main similarity between political parties and interest groups is that they both seek to achieve certain policy objectives. These can be a broad range of policy objectives or only a relative few.
Political parties have a large number of policy objectives that they wish to achieve, whereas pressure groups tend to have only a few. Some pressure groups, such as those that campaign for the protection of the environment, are based around a single issue.
As such, pressure groups tend to have greater coherence than political parties, as it is much easier for their members to unite around a common single objective than a broad range of policies.
This helps to explain why pressure groups endeavor to bring about changes in policy without attaining political power. Their focus is so narrow that it would be virtually impossible for them to secure the kind of broad-based coalition that is essential in a democracy for a political party.
However, despite remaining outside of the formal democratic process, pressure groups—as their name implies—can still exert considerable pressure on policy-makers in order to get the changes that they seek.
Such changes are not always forthcoming, however, because political parties tend to be quite broad-based coalitions. This means that policy-makers need to take into consideration a broad range of stakeholders whose interests are often opposed to those of relevant pressure groups. As a consequence, any changes made by political parties in power tend not to be as bold or as radical as pressure groups, who don't have to deal with the necessary compromises of political power in a democracy, would like.