Answer: Land Residual Method
Explanation:
Land residual method of site evaluation is the method of estimating land value in which the net operating income attributable to the land is isolated and capitalized to produce an indication of the land's contribution to the total property.
This particular method uses income as being the basis for value and is used in appraising income producing properties.
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
In simple words, avoidable costs refers to those expenditures which can be avoided by the management of the business if they want to as such expenditures are usually made for additional support.
Irrelevant costs include factors which will not be impacted by a management action, whether positively or negatively. Consequently, unnecessary factors, such as static overhead as well as sunken factors, are overlooked in making the choice. Nonetheless, in addition to ultimately save the company it is important for a management to be able to discern an insignificant expense.
Answer:
Part a
Debit : Profit and loss $0
Debit : Cash $15,100
Debit : Accumulated depreciation $35,900
Credit : Cost $ 51,000
Part b
Debit : Profit and loss $2,200
Debit : Cash $15,100
Debit : Accumulated depreciation $35,900
Credit : Cost $ 51,000
Part c
Debit : Cash $15,100
Debit : Accumulated depreciation $35,900
Credit : Cost $ 51,000
Debit : Profit and loss $2,200
Explanation:
the journal entry for the disposal of the truck are shown
Answer:
No penalty
Explanation:
The tax penalty is as follows
The HSA i.e. health saving account. It is opened so that the expenses related to the medical could be paid and the high health plan i.e. deductible (HDHP) would not covered here
In the case when rules are not followed so there is a penalty of 20%
Given that the amount taxable is $15,000
So here the penalty would be
= $15,000 × 20%
= $3,000
But since Marilyn age is 66 so there is no penalty as the penalty would be applied till the age of 65
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The conservative approach is that the firm has greater level of working capital investment than the competitor or industry average. So to fund the higher level of working capital the company has a set of policy and targets related to the level of debt level which means the company will not be willing to borrow further money if their borrowing exceeds the set limit or benchmark. They might use the equity instruments (Preferred stock or Common equity) to fund the higher level of working capital.
So their no absolute argument whether the denominator will increase or the nominator will increase in the Total debt to capital ratio. Hence the statement is false.
