Answer:
Louise's defense is not valid. She was involved in an Implied-in-fact contracts
Explanation:
Implied-in-fact Contracts
This is a contract that is legally enforceable as a result of an agreement made by conduct and from assumed intentions. These conducts and assumed intentions are derived from the relationship among the involved parties.
When Louise saw Midcity Painters painting her house and made no comments, she became involved a implied-in-fact contract. The conduct of Midcity to paint her house and her conduct to be quiet infact formed a legally enforceable contract.
Louise, therefore, liable. However, due to the lack of contractual terms such as payment for the job done, Louise will be liable for the nominally or typically acceptable rate for such a job done. For instance, if a normal house paint job costs $2000, Louise is liable to pay $2000 for the implied contract.
In a situation wherein Country Y has a progressive tax system for income, with no credits or deductions, a CEO earning $2.5 million per year would pay the most as a percentage of income in the country Y. Therefore, the option D holds true.
<h3>What is the significance of a progressive tax system?</h3>
A progressive tax system can be referred to or considered as a system wherein the percentage of tax to be levied increases with an increase in the total taxable income for an individual. The rates of taxation under this system are defined under percentage.
In the situation given above, when a CEO in country Y earns $2.5 million, i.e., more than any other person mentioned above, he will be the one who will have to pay the most taxes as a part of percentage of his income.
Therefore, the option D holds true and states regarding the significance of the progressive tax system.
Learn more about progressive tax system here:
brainly.com/question/12416177
#SPJ2
Answer:
The rate of return on the investment if the price fall by 7% next year is -22% which is shown below.
The price of Telecom would have to fall by $71.43($250-$178.57), before a margin call could be placed.
Lastly,if the price fall immediately,the margin price would $178.57 as shown below
Explanation:
Total shares bought=$40000/$250=160 shares
Interest on amount borrowed=8%*$20000=$1600
When the price falls by 7% the new price =$250(1-0.07)=$232.50
Hence rate of return=(New price*number of shares-Interest-total investment)/initial investor's funds
=($232.50*160-$40000-$1600)/$20000=-22%
Initial margin=investor's money/total investment=$20000/$40000=50%
maintenance margin=30%
Margin call price=Current price x (1- initial margin)/ (1- maintenance margin)
=$250*(1-0.5)/(1-0.3)
=$178.57
Answer:
The maximum profit and loss for this position is $3 and -$7 respectively
Explanation:
The computations are shown below:
For maximum profit:
= Strike price at the sale - stock price + put price - call price
= $42 - $39 + $0.55 - $0.55
= $3
For maximum loss:
= Strike price at purchase - stock price + put price - call price
= $32 - $39 + $0.55 - $0.55
= -$7
Simply we take the difference between the strike price ,and the stock price and after that the put and call price are adjusted
Answer:
<h3>A limited liability company is the US-specific form of a private limited company. It is a business structure that can combine the pass-through taxation of a partnership or sole proprietorship with the limited liability of a corporation. </h3>
hope it help :)
