Answer:
it can still gain from international trade in that commodity, by getting it at a lower opportunity cost than if it produced it domestically.
Explanation:
A country has comparative disadvantage in production if it produces at a higher opportunity cost when compared to other countries.
The country with a comparative disadvantage can gain from trade by trading the good with a country that has comparative advantage in the production of that good. i.e. the country produces at a lower opportunity cost
For example, country A produces 10kg of beans and 5kg of rice. Country B produces 5kg of beans and 10kg of rice.
for country A,
opportunity cost of producing beans = 5/10 = 0.5
opportunity cost of producing rice = 10/5 = 2
for country B,
opportunity cost of producing rice = 5/10 = 0.5
opportunity cost of producing beans = 10/5 = 2
Country B has a comparative disadvantage in the production of beans and country A has a comparative disadvantage in the production of rice
Country B should buy beans from A and A should buy rice from B
Answer:
e. does not always lead to high prices.
Explanation:
Profit-maximization pricing means fixing prices so that total revenue is more as compared to total costs. This pricing strategy is used by a monopolist.
It is the short run or long run process by which the price and output level is determined by the firm that can give the maximum profit.
The price per item has been set higher than its total cost of production make to sure that the company makes a profit on each sale. As a result, the company makes a profit on every sale and to reduce risk and uncertainty factors in business operations.
Profit maximization pricing objective <u>does not always lead to high prices</u>.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Step-by-step explanation:
Step-by-step explanation:
Explanation:
Answer:
Y = 300
government multiplier 2
output demanded increase by 20
If income tax is applied:
Y = 272.72
multipliers: 2.253775
increase 22.53775 billons
As disclosure it has a larget effect when the income tax is levied based on income rather than a flat rate.
Explanation:
DI = Y - 100
C = 30 + 0.6(Y - 100)
C = 30 - 60 + 0.6Y
C = 0.6Y - 30
Y = C + G + I
Y = (0.6Y -30) + 120 + 30
Y = 120 / 0.4 = 300
C = (0.6)300 - 30 = 150
With C we solve for the multiplier:
150/300 = 0.5
1 / (1 - 0.5) = 2
10 x 2 = 20
If variable that:
C = 30 + 0.6 (0.75Y)
C = 30 + 0.45Y
Y = 0.45Y + 120 + 30
Y = 150/.55 = 272,72
C = 30 + 0.45Y = 152,72
Propensitivity to consume:
152.72/272.72 = 0,5563
multiplier:
1 (1 - PMC) = 2.253775073
10 nillon will icnrease x 2.25377 = 22.54 billons
