Answer:
0.76
Explanation:
So, in this particular question we are given that that there are two assets which are the; [1]. stock fund and [2]. a long-term government and corporate bond fund.
From the question/problem, we have that the Expected ret and the std. dev. for the Stock fund is 18% and 25% respectively. Also, the Expected ret and std. dev. for Bond fund 11% and 18% respectively.
Thus, the investment proportion in the minimum variance portfolio of the bond fund = 1 - [ ( 18%)² - 0.4 × 25% × 18%) ÷ ( 25%)² + (18%)² - 2 × 0.4 × 25% × 18%. = 1 - [0.0144 ÷ 0.0609 ] = 1 - 0.24 = 0.76.
Answer:
Instructions are listed below
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
For the purchase option:
Buying price= $22 per unit.
For the make option:
Weekly rental payment of $30,800
The firm also has to hire five operators to help make product A. Each operator works eight hours per day, five days per week at the rate of $14 per hour.
The material cost for the make option is $15 per unit of product A.
A) We need to find the number of units that makes the unitary fixed costs= $7
Weekly rental= 30800
Direct labor= ($14*8 hours*5workes)*5 days= 2800
Total fixed costs= $33,600
Unitary fixed costs= total fixed costs/ Q
7=33600/Q
Q= 4800 units
B) Now Q= 6600
Buy= 6600*22= $145,200
Make= 6600*15 + 33600= $132,600
Answer:
B. $497,000
Explanation:
Consolidated Balance of Equipment
Excess value at the acquisition $110,000
($350,000-$240000)
Book value as on Dec 31 2018 of Ford $170,000
Book value as on Dec 31 2018 of Regent $250,000
Less: excess depreciation <u>-$33,000 </u> ($110,000/10*3)
Consolidated balance of equipment <u>$497,000</u>
Tha is thanks for the free 8 points
Over population, It can result from an increase in births (fertility rate), a decline in the mortality rate, an increase in immigration, or a depletion of resources. And less food for people who actually need it the state that had the least amount of people is China because it has a one child policy and if they break the law they can be executed and it’s to maintain current unsustainable consumption patterns while blaming the poor, women, people of color, immigrants, and those residing in the “global South” who produce a negligible impact on the environment.
