Answer:
This question lacks options, options are:
a) an explanation of the relationships among particular phenomena
b) an intended and recognized consequence of some element of society.
c) a description comprised of the essential characteristics of a feature of society.
d) the meanings that individuals attach to their actions.
The correct answer is a.
Explanation:
The theory is a fundamental aspect in the development of knowledge, a theory is a system or a set of statements that establish relationships (implication, causality, correlation, probability, etc.) between concepts (of different extension and / or intention) with the purpose of explaining, describing and predicting the phenomena, this through the systematization (the specification of relationships between variables) of the knowledge about the phenomenon studied.
The essay should show your opinion and understanding of the past presidents' debates. As I do not have access to your interpretations of the debate, I cannot write the essay, but I will show you how to write it.
<h3>Essay structure</h3>
- Introduction: Write a short paragraph, about what this speech was and how inflation was a subject covered in it.
- Thesis statement: Write a single sentence, which should end your introduction. The thesis statement should show which candidate approached the topic of inflation most convincingly in your opinion.
- Body: Write two paragraphs. These paragraphs must be long because they are the ones where you will show your positions on the debate. In the first paragraph, you will show evidence that your thesis statement is correct, showing the reasons that make you believe that a candidate was more convincing and approached the subject correctly. In the second paragraph, you will criticize the way the other candidate approached the subject and show the reasons that make that candidate's arguments not convincing to you.
- Conclusion: You will write a short paragraph, where you will show and reinforce your thesis statement, reaffirming the candidate who was most efficient and how the words of this candidate were in line with the society of that time.
You will need to watch, listen or read the debate to write this essay and you can use articles that analyze the performance of the two candidates to strengthen your arguments.
Below you can see an example of how you can write the introduction and thesis statement for your essay:
<em>The debate between Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan was one of the major milestones of the 1980 presidential election. In that year, American society suffered from a lack of economic stability and rising inflation, which made this one of the most important issues in the debate. , which was best addressed by Reagan.</em>
Learn more about what inflation is:
brainly.com/question/15555995
#SPJ1
Answer:
a. The farmer plays a bigger role in the landscape than Icarus.
Explanation:
Answer:
the moral and ethical principles traditionally upheld and passed on within a family, as fidelty, honesty, truth, and faith." "values especially of a traditional or conservative kind which are held to promote the sound functioning of the family and to strengthen the fabric of society."By promoting the values of social responsibility, solidarity, and social utility, social ethics stands as the fulcrum of a rational, moral, egalitarian, pluralistic, democratic society rising on the pillars of human rights and human dignity.
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
Darrel is gay and some of his co-workers are aware of this. At work, he uses communication strategies that emphasize trying to fit in and be accepted by a dominant group. He talks about his nephews when his colleagues talk about their kids, and he laughs at some homophobic jokes that he doesn't really feel are funny. Darrel is using a(n) _____ accommodation strategy in order to assimilate.
a. assertive
b. elaborate
c. aggressive
d. non-assertive
Answer:
The correct answer is letter d. non-assertive.
Explanation:
<u>When people adopt a non-assertive strategy in communication, they are basically trying to fit in the dominant group. They tend to avoid conflicts as much as possible, even if it means they have to accept normally offensive things and situations. They end up censoring themselves, putting up some interpersonal barriers.</u> Darrel has chosen this strategy to prevent conflicts at his workplace. His colleagues, on the other hand, do not seem at all afraid to hurt his feelings.
