For number 2 you could say for in favor of the act was it made the tea cheaper and would make colonists purchase it or that it helped bail out the east India company so they weren’t in debt. But against the tea act you can say many colonist opposed it because it seemed to validate the townshend tax on tea or in other words kinda you can said colonists believed that it violated their rights as Englishmen to “no taxation without representation”
Answer:
It went against it because you can't take property without fair compensation which is stated in the fifth amendment.
Explanation:
In the fifth amendment it states that the government can not take private property without fair compensation.
Explanation:
Tuskegee Institute, founded by Washington, was the first institution of higher learning for African Americans; Washington came under pressure from critics who viewed him as an accommodationist because they felt he de-emphasized racism, racial violence against blacks, and discrimination.
Answer:
the friction from the skates and the ice creates like a brake . it slows them down by touching
Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
