Answer:
Explanation:
Scientists collect their evidence through experimentation and/or observation.
Answer:
cellular respiration...that's breathing out of humans
and through human activities like burning of fossil fuels...
Answer:
(c)-All results for the experimental groups involving wing surgery would be invalid.
Explanation:
The study researcher shown in the above question noted that flies that underwent wing surgery were more attacked than those that received no wing treatment. However, the researcher does not show the study variables and, consequently, does not show any relationship between the variables and the research result. For this reason, we can state that based on this result, all results for experimental groups involving wing surgery would be invalid.
In biochemistry, two biopolymers are antiparallel if<span> they run </span>parallel<span> to each other but with opposite alignments. An example is the two complementary strands of a </span>DNA<span>double helix, which run in opposite directions alongside each other.</span>
Answer:
Experiments
Explanation:
The ancient Greek philosophers spent more time philosophising and thinking about scientific explanations to phenomena in the natural world.
How ever, they relied solely on reasoning while attempting to explain scientific observations. Contemporarily, science is highly empirical. The scientific process can only be complete when scientific observations are subjects to rigorous experiments in order go determine the actual relationship between variables and provide better explanation for scientific observations.
Hence the ancient Greek philosophers should have used experiments rather than sole reason in proffering scientific explanations to natural phenomena.
