Answer: 1 its on the owners property i think it would be considerd "self defense".
not because it was on his property and it was perfectly legal if the thief was on his thier property trespassing.
The most likely answer is that the victims should not be able to sue the manufacturer of a violent game for a design effect. This is because it is difficult to establish a direct connection between the video game and the mass shooting. It is likely that thousands, or even millions of other people have played the game constantly and have not developed these tendencies. Moreover, even if the tendencies were developed, this would not mean that the thoughts would develop into action. Thefore, it is unlikely that the manufacturer would be considered liable.
False.
I’m pretty sure I’m right
Hope I helped :)
And please mark brainilest when u get the chance
Answer:
Carry proof of insurance whenever you drive
Explanation:
