TIME SENSITIVE!!! What will the first row of this multiplication be? (first image is the problem, second is the options)

The photo is kinda blurry but I need help fast

enyata [817]

To find the rate of change find the difference in the Y values for every X value.

From X 1 to X 3 the Y value changes by -10

-10 / 2 = -5.

The rate of change is -5.

The initial value is when X = 0

When X is 1, the Y value is 20, using the rate of change of -5, this means when X is 0, the Y value would be 25.

The answer would be, the initial value is 25, rate of change is -5

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

PLS HELP ME 50 POINTS!!!!! I NEED AN ANSWER ASAP!!!!!!

Sholpan [36]

Answer:

They went up 16 levels.

Step-by-step explanation:

You can find that by finding the distance from -2 to 14.
To find the distance from two numbers, $a$ and $b$ , we can substitute both in the formula $d = |b - a|$ , where d is the distance between them.

$d = |14 - (-2)| \to |14 + 2|\to|16|\to16$

4 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

Solve for x:

mariarad [96]

Answer:The value of x can be calculated by the following steps;

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

What 2a=4.6 show your work

victus00 [196]

Answer: a=2.3

Step-by-step explanation:

divide both sides by 2

4.6 divided by 2 is 2.3

5 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Tain has a great literary tradition that spans centuries. One might assume, then, that Britons read more than citizens of other

tresset_1 [31]

Answer:

Null hypothesis: $p_{1} \leq p_{2}$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_{1} > p_{2}$

$z=3.02$

$p_v =P(Z>3.02)=0.00127$

The p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example $\alpha=0.05, 0,1,0.15$ always $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the the proportion of Canadians is not significantly higher than the porportions of readers at Britons.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation

$X_{1}=0.86*1004$ represent the number of Canadians randomly sampled by Gallup that read at least one book in the past year

$X_{2}=0.81*1009$ represent the number of Britons randomly sampled that read at least one book in the past year

$n_{1}=1004$ sample of Gallup selected

$n_{2}=1009$ sample of Britons selected

$p_{1}=0.86$ represent the proportion of Canadians randomly sampled by Gallup that read at least one book in the past year

$p_{2}=0.81$ represent the proportion of Britons randomly sampled that read at least one book in the past year

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the value for the test (variable of interest)

2) Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the proportion for men with red/green color blindness is a higher than the rate for women , the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $p_{1} \leq p_{2}$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_{1} > p_{2}$

We need to apply a z test to compare proportions, and the statistic is given by:

$z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}$ (1)

Where $\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{0.81+0.86}{2}=0.835$

3) Calculate the statistic

Replacing in formula (1) the values obtained we got this:

$z=\frac{0.86-0.81}{\sqrt{0.835(1-0.835)(\frac{1}{1004}+\frac{1}{1009})}}=3.02$

4) Statistical decision

For this case we don't have a significance level provided $\alpha$ , but we can calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a one side test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(Z>3.02)=0.00127$

So the p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example $\alpha=0.05, 0,1,0.15$ always $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the the proportion of Canadians is not significantly higher than the porportions of readers at Britons.

5 0

3 years ago