Answer: Charlemagne was the king of the Franks.
Explanation:
Charlemagne was a Frankish man who became crowned at a time less than 100 A.D. He led the Frankish people to victory on the battlefield during his reign.
Both example one and two are civil cases. Civil cases are those that involve contracts and/or wrongful or negligent acts resulting in the private wrong, damage, or injury of someone or something.
State court has original jurisdiction over both examples due to both dealing with local citizens. If appealed, both cases may go before the federal court due to the question of infringement on constitutional rights in each example.
Answer: 1. Roosevelts statement on immigrants was considered vastly progressive for the time, as people had been discriminating against people based on birthplace for years. That wasn't the kind of change in people you would expect to see overnight, but he pushed for it anyway.
2. I feel like this statement is very much valid, if not underperforming. It doesn't matter where you come from, or what your country of origin was like, all that matters is you're here not and how you act now. Not hiring somebody because of where they are from will only windup as a huge loss for your business,
<span><span>The Espionage Act of 1917
was created to forbid intrusion of military operations and military
recruitment. It was also intended to
stop insubordination in the military, and to check the assistance of enemies of
the United States during times of war. In 1919, the U.S. Supreme Court </span>solidly
declared through Schenck vs. United States that
the act did not disregard the freedom
of speech of those sentenced under its provisions. The case of Charles Schenck who was the
general secretary of the Executive Committee of the Socialist Party who
distributed leaflets exhorting men not to obey the draft because
they considered involuntary servitude.
Schenck and a fellow named were convicted because the court defended the
decision because the situation during times of war require stricter measures
compared to times of peace of the presence of dangerous forces.</span>
Answer:
This collection of information is an example of public behavior.
Explanation:
-Private information refers to information that is linked to people and provides details about their lives.
-Public information refers to information that is not confidential and is available to everyone.
-Private behavior refers to a behavior that is not accessible to any individual apart from the person that does that.
-Public behavior refers to a behavior that can be observed by anyone.
According to the definitions and the information provided, the answer is that this collection of information is an example of public behavior because the researcher is in a public place and she is observing people's behaviors that can be seen by anyone.
