In the context of team and organizational effectiveness, the Dunning–Kruger effect refers to people systematically overestimating their own performance in areas where they lack competence and readily dismissing any information to the contrary.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Dunning-Kruger effects refer a situation in which people trust like they only smart and have more ability than in real scenario. However, person with less capability do not possess the more skills which required to realise their own inability.
Golem effect, a psychological effects in which less expectations are made upon individual either by superiors or by themselves, leading to poorer performance. Pygmalion effect defines the phenomenon where others' expectations for achieving the target by a person affects the aimed person's performance level.
Autler towns’ effect is related with the ohysic term for the effect and result to an oscillating electric field. From this, concluding that Option A is correct to the given statement.
Answer:
The correct answer is b. social phenomena.
Explanation:
A social phenomenon is a fact that makes man responsible for the events of community life and his own social situation, lucidly manifesting himself against the elements that condition, subdue and exploit him, in such a way that they lead him inescapably towards a transformation of its own. They are actions that come from the influence of one or more people on another person, they cover all types of interpersonal behavior (physical or oral) and the moments where two or more individuals act. These phenomena are observable and practical in the social life of being human, they also constitute the basic information for sociology; They are all the procedures that occur within a society, which can be carried out by some of its members or by its entirety.
According to Fiedler's contingency model of leadership, a leader's performance depends on their own styles and how much control and influence they have over the circumstance.
<h3>What is Fiedler's theory of contingent leadership?</h3>
According to Fiedler's Contingency Theory, a leader's leadership style needs to be appropriate for the circumstances in order to be effective. You can use this model to determine your own leadership style, evaluate the situation that calls for leadership, and assess whether you are the best candidate.
Consider a basketball team as a first example of using Fiedler's model, as they have a disciplined work, a low amount of power, and (in theory) good leader-member connections. Instead of a relationship-focused coach giving everyone an equal voice in this situation, you would want a task-oriented coach to define the game strategy.
<h3>What is suggested by Fielder's theory?</h3>
Most notably, Fiedler's theory contends that a leader's personality is not the sole factor in determining how effective they are. Instead, this situational theory contends that when people are in settings that support their particular leadership philosophies, they develop into supportive leaders.
Learn more about Fiedler's Contingency Theory: brainly.com/question/20709656
#SPJ1
There might not be enough oxygen for us to survive. As the plants and animals circulate the flow of oxygen and carbon, it wouldn’t be enough. Say you were trapped in a vacuum (not the one you use to clean your house). You would have only enough oxygen in your lungs to last you for a little while, but then there is too much carbon in the air that we exhale. Plants and animals use that carbon to release oxygen. So, without them, earth would be filled with carbon
