The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
Which of the following is not a permissible circumstance under which to implement a prior restraint, under Near v. Minnesota?
a. obscene publications.
b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
c. Obstruction of military recruitment.
d. Publication of troop movement in the time of war.
Answer:
The answer is b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
Explanation:
Although it is possible for certain words to cause immense violence when used in publications, under Near v. Minnesota (a United States Supreme Court decision which declared that prior restraints on publication violated the freedom of speech and press) it is still not permissible to implement a prior restraint, even when publications use fighting words that are likely to promote immense violence.
It really depends on how you look at after the fight with Germany ended we were still fighting Japan but the U.S dropped 2 atomic bombs killing over 360,000 people they did it without telling the allies because they wanted to send a message to Russia basically saying that we have these types of weapons don’t mess with us basically a flex. After the bombs were dropped the war ended but I don’t believe justice was served because the U.S committed a war crime by dropping those bombs and they did it for research purposes because as soon as the war ended they sent over researchers to go collect data on what happened and how it effected the people. There is a lot more in depth stuff that will make my argument more strong but if I type all that out I will be here all day. Over all I don’t believe justice was served but that’s everyone’s own opinion.
Answer:
A. Have to pay a fine
Explanation:
Driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) is a serious misdemeanor punishable under the law with months of jail term in addition to high fines depending on the state law. This punishment of this law is also dependent on the level of blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of the culprit at the time of arrest. Other punishment under DUI law include loss of driving privileges for a specified time where the culprits will be subjected to undergoing DUI school, observation and test for possible alcohol addiction and treatment.
The correct answer is A. You may have to pay a fine
Federalists and Anti-Federalists. To remember what they believed you can remember this: Federalists were for the Constitution, Anti-Federalists were against it.
