Answer:
its been boring, but its raining so its making it a bit more exciting.
Explanation:
thanks for asking :)
The point in the criminal justice process the whistle-blowing would have occurred is called the count bargaining.
There are also other three different types of plea bargaining, which are the charge bargaining, the sentence bargaining, and the facto bargaining.
<h3 /><h3>What is count bargaining?</h3>
Corresponds to a negotiation where the confession is related to the count bargain, that is, when the suspicions are not recognized the prosecutor can ignore the guilt in suspicions of a confession.
This occurs through the defendant alleging only one of the original charges, the others then being dropped. An example of a count bargain occurs when a prosecution accuses an individual of assault and theft, and the parties decide that the defendant will plead only guilt on the assault charge, so the prosecution will ignore the defendant's guilt on the theft charge.
Therefore, the count bargaining is a process of fairness that the allegation is in respect of the accused of the allegations, being a form of negotiaton.
Find out more about count bargaining here:
brainly.com/question/11819753
#SPJ1
The answer is A is just is because it's logic
this isn't an answer!
um hey ill do this for you but um your going to have to give more then 5 points lol your asking for a paragraph about every single amendment in the constitution and a list of situations a police officer would need knowledge of each amendment to do his or her job properly... and a another paragraph describing why this amendment is important to police work
that will take at least 1 hour so chile um anywayssss 5 points for that? honey noo
20 points and brainlest and its done
psa:
*don't come at me bruh this is a public forum and im just stating my opinion
*please treat people with kindness, wear a mask, and have a lovely day.
Explanation:
A contract is said to be induced by 'undue influence' where the relations subsisting between the parties are such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other.
