1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vedmedyk [2.9K]
1 year ago
8

At a manor, what responsibility did the lord and the lady share? settling disputes educating children participating in mass coll

ecting taxes
History
1 answer:
balandron [24]1 year ago
3 0

In manor houses, the responsibility that both the Lord and the Lady shared was participating in mass.

<h3>How were roles reserved in a manor?</h3>

Manors were popular in medieval times which was when the roles of ladies were more domestic.

This meant that they raised children and were in charge of the manor. Both the Lord and the Lady would both participate in mass however because it was expected of them by religion.

Find out more on gender roles in medieval times at brainly.com/question/14801848.

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Why did Americans settlers move to the western United States
yanalaym [24]
American settlers started moving west because they wanted a better life, a big factor of settlers moving west was also for land since it was very cheap, also gold and mining opportunities.
7 0
3 years ago
Why westward expansion create more conflict between the north and south
Eva8 [605]

In 1803, President Thomas Jefferson purchased the territory of Louisiana from the French government for $15 million. The Louisiana Purchase stretched from the Mississippi River to the Rocky Mountains and from Canada to New Orleans, and it doubled the size of the United States. To Jefferson, westward expansion was the key to the nation’s health: He believed that a republic depended on an independent, virtuous citizenry for its survival, and that independence and virtue went hand in hand with land ownership, especially the ownership of small farms. (“Those who labor in the earth,” he wrote, “are the chosen people of God.”) In order to provide enough land to sustain this ideal population of virtuous yeomen, the United States would have to continue to expand. The westward expansion of the United States is one of the defining themes of 19th-century American history, but it is not just the story of Jefferson’s expanding “empire of liberty.” On the contrary, as one historian writes, in the six decades after the Louisiana Purchase, westward expansion “very nearly destroy[ed] the republic.”

Manifest Destiny

By 1840, nearly 7 million Americans–40 percent of the nation’s population–lived in the trans-Appalachian West. Following a trail blazed by Lewis and Clark, most of these people had left their homes in the East in search of economic opportunity. Like Thomas Jefferson, many of these pioneers associated westward migration, land ownership and farming with freedom. In Europe, large numbers of factory workers formed a dependent and seemingly permanent working class; by contrast, in the United States, the western frontier offered the possibility of independence and upward mobility for all. In 1843, one thousand pioneers took to the Oregon Trail as part of the “Great Emigration.”

Did you know? In 1853, the Gadsden Purchase added about 30,000 square miles of Mexican territory to the United States and fixed the boundaries of the “lower 48” where they are today.

In 1845, a journalist named John O’Sullivan put a name to the idea that helped pull many pioneers toward the western frontier. Westward migration was an essential part of the republican project, he argued, and it was Americans’ “manifest destiny” to carry the “great experiment of liberty” to the edge of the continent: to “overspread and to possess the whole of the [land] which Providence has given us,” O’Sullivan wrote. The survival of American freedom depended on it.

Westward Expansion and Slavery

Meanwhile, the question of whether or not slavery would be allowed in the new western states shadowed every conversation about the frontier. In 1820, the Missouri Compromise had attempted to resolve this question: It had admitted Missouri to the union as a slave state and Maine as a free state, preserving the fragile balance in Congress. More important, it had stipulated that in the future, slavery would be prohibited north of the southern boundary of Missouri (the 36º30’ parallel) in the rest of the Louisiana Purchase.

However, the Missouri Compromise did not apply to new territories that were not part of the Louisiana Purchase, and so the issue of slavery continued to fester as the nation expanded. The Southern economy grew increasingly dependent on “King Cotton” and the system of forced labor that sustained it. Meanwhile, more and more Northerners came to believed that the expansion of slavery impinged upon their own liberty, both as citizens–the pro-slavery majority in Congress did not seem to represent their interests–and as yeoman farmers. They did not necessarily object to slavery itself, but they resented the way its expansion seemed to interfere with their own economic opportunity.

Westward Expansion and the Mexican War

Despite this sectional conflict, Americans kept on migrating West in the years after the Missouri Compromise was adopted. Thousands of people crossed the Rockies to the Oregon Territory, which belonged to Great Britain, and thousands more moved into the Mexican territories of California, New Mexico and Texas. In 1837, American settlers in Texas joined with their Tejano neighbors (Texans of Spanish origin) and won independence from Mexico. They petitioned to join the United States as a slave state.

3 0
3 years ago
Which military strategy did the patriots use during the revolutionary War?​
Oliga [24]

Answer:

gurilla warfare

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Which of these was an opinion held by opponents to the Constitution in 1787?
marysya [2.9K]

Answer:

D) A bill of rights should be added to the Constitution

Explanation:

Before the Constitution could be ratified in 1787, Anti-Federalists sprung up. They were concerned that the Constitution didn't protect their rights at all, and were worried that a powerful central government would steal these rights away. As such, a Bill of Rights was demanded to protect the people.

8 0
3 years ago
What was a consequence of the Boston tea party
vichka [17]
The Boston Habor was closed and British troops occupied the city
4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • First president of the United States who warned against foreign alliances in his farewell address Nd set the precedent for a two
    10·1 answer
  • Which tactic did Charles Townshend use to increase British control of the American colonies?
    7·2 answers
  • How long was the Trail of Tears?<br> A. 250 miles<br> B. 450 miles<br> C. 650 miles<br> D. 850 miles
    10·1 answer
  • In the 1800s, violent, anti-Chinese riots took place
    13·1 answer
  • The system of government that delegates power to the national government, to the state governments, and to the local governments
    15·1 answer
  • Which four words most emphasize a call for unity in the excerpt president barack obamas farewell speech
    12·2 answers
  • gumawa ng isang saknong na may apat na taludtod na tula gamit ang temang pagpapahalaga sa sariling kultura ang subject na ito ay
    15·1 answer
  • Match the following terms with the correct definition.
    15·1 answer
  • The third requested constitutional amendment put forth by the Hartford Convention was most likely motivated by which of the foll
    8·2 answers
  • Prayer five times a day, declaration of faith, fasting during Ramadan, Hajj, and alms giving are *
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!