1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anarel [89]
3 years ago
12

After a terrible accident in which a spike went through his brain, Phineas Gage had severe damage to his brain, including his fr

ontal lobe. As a result, what happened to him?
History
2 answers:
tino4ka555 [31]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Hey there!

When one damage's his or her frontal lobe, memory impairment is a common effect. Additionally, his behavior, and emotions may be uncontrollable, or changing constantly.

Let me know if this helps :)

Mrac [35]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Gage had drastic change in his behavior and personality

You might be interested in
3. explain one way in which increased international trade improved the standard of living for both Americans and Europeans. (5 p
scoray [572]

International trade enables specialization, which brings increased efficiency and greater competition to spur the market.

This happens because Specialization would make each nation to focus on producing certain type of products in which they would gain a competitive advantage towards other (either because they had the necessary materials sources or labor qualities) and would create better and cheaper product in the market.

8 0
2 years ago
Extract a definition and an example of both similes and metaphore<br>​
Fittoniya [83]
Similes- a figure of speech involving the comparison of one thing with another thing of a different kind, used to make a description more emphatic or vivid
Example- She was as sly as a fox.

Metaphor- a figure of speech in which a word or phrase is applied to an object or action to which it is not literally applicable.
Example-Laughter is the best medicine.
6 0
2 years ago
Describe what happened at the “Rap of Nanjing” and give me your thoughts on the US response. How much did we know and would you
Ostrovityanka [42]

Following a bloody victory in Shanghai during the Sino-Japanese War, the Japanese turned their attention towards Nanking. Fearful of losing them in battle, Nationalist leader Chiang Kai-Shek ordered the removal of nearly all official Chinese troops from the city, leaving it defended by untrained auxiliary troops. Chiang also ordered the city held at any cost, and forbade the official evacuation of its citizens. Many ignored this order and fled, but the rest were left to the mercy of the approaching enemy.

Did you know? Once one of China's most prosperous cities and industrial centers, Nanking took decades to recover from the devastation it experienced. Abandoned as the national capital in 1949 for Beijing, it grew into a modern industrial city during the communist period and today is home to many of China's largest state-owned firms.

A small group of Western businessmen and missionaries, the International Committee for the Nanking Safety Zone, attempted to set up a neutral area of the city that would provide refuge for Nanking’s citizens. The safety zone, opened in November 1937, was roughly the size of New York’s Central Park and consisted of more than a dozen small refugee camps. On December 1, the Chinese government abandoned Nanking, leaving the International Committee in charge. All remaining citizens were ordered into the safety zone for their protection.

Arrival of the Troops

On December 13, the first troops of Japan’s Central China Front Army, commanded by General Matsui Iwane, entered the city. Even before their arrival, word had begun spreading of the numerous atrocities they had committed on their way through China, including killing contests and pillaging. Chinese soldiers were hunted down and killed by the thousands, and left in mass graves. Entire families were massacred, and even the elderly and infants were targeted for execution, while tens of thousands of women were raped. Bodies littered the streets for months after the attack. Determined to destroy the city, the Japanese looted and burned at least one-third of Nanking’s buildings.

Though the Japanese initially agreed to respect the Nanking Safety Zone, ultimately not even these refugees were safe from the vicious attacks. In January 1938, the Japanese declared that order had been restored in the city, and dismantled the safety zone; killings continued until the first week of February. A puppet government was installed, which would rule Nanking until the end of World War II.

Aftermath of the Massacre

There are no official numbers for the death toll in the Nanking Massacre, though estimates range from 200,000 to 300,000 people. Soon after the end of the war, Matsui and his lieutenant Tani Hisao, were tried and convicted for war crimes by the International Military Tribunal for the Far East and were executed. Anger over the events at Nanking continues to color Sino-Japanese relations to this day. The true nature of the massacre has been disputed and exploited for propaganda purposes by historical revisionists, apologists and Japanese nationalists. Some claim the numbers of deaths have been inflated, while others have denied that any massacre occurred.

4 0
3 years ago
Between 1918 and 1921, the government of the Soviet Union took control of all land, industry, banking, and shipping. This is an
olga2289 [7]

Nationalization is the kind of economic transformation and the example for the given statement.

Answer: Option C

<u>Explanation:</u>

During the period of Russian Civil War, the government followed a war communism type of government from the periods 1918 to 1921. Under this type of governance, all the industries were nationalized i.e., control was transferred to the government from private parties.

This was controlled by a strict management system from the central government. This was done by the Bolshevik government. However, people argued saying that this was done to eliminate poverty among the private parties.

3 0
3 years ago
All of the following are true of the Dred Scott v. Sandford except A. Scott could only sue in state courts. B. living in a free
vlada-n [284]
The answer that is not true is A:  "Scott could only sue in state courts."

Whether Dred Scott, as a slave, had any legal right to sue in court was a matter that applied whether talking about state or federal courts.  When Scott's suit was rejected by a state of Missouri court, Scott and his supporters managed to bring the case into a federal court, and it went all the way to the Supreme Court.  Though the Supreme Court at the time ruled that Scott had no right to bring the suit because he was a slave and not a citizen (point D above), the case gave Chief Justice Roger Taney opportunity to make further statements regarding the slavery issue, including points B and C in your list above.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How were the towns of stockton and marysville changed by the gold rush?
    14·1 answer
  • The ______ was a large, well-coordinated attack by the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese that coincided with the
    8·1 answer
  • 3. In your own words explain why Mexico banned<br> slavery before Texas became independent.
    10·2 answers
  • Please Help and Quick Which body if water is east of Europe.
    14·2 answers
  • What was the impact of the northwest ordinance?
    11·2 answers
  • How did the rise of mass production techniques and the impact of new technologies change America during the 1920s?
    12·1 answer
  • The reason New Hampshire was founded
    12·1 answer
  • He the president shall have power with the advice and consent of the senate to make treaties provide two third of the senator pr
    11·1 answer
  • How do i add someone on brainly? im trying to add my sister and i dont know how​
    6·1 answer
  • All of the following are TRUE about Columbus M. "Dad" Joiner EXCEPT:
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!