1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AnnZ [28]
2 years ago
6

What happens when a criminal case is brought to the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals, then reappealed after the court has hear

d the case?
A.
A case decided by the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals cannot be reappealed.
B.
The case must be appealed to the federal courts; if they refuse to hear the appeal, the case cannot be reappealed.
C.
The case must be appealed to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma; after the case is heard by the supreme court, it cannot be reappealed.
D.
The case can be appealed first to Oklahoma’s district courts, then to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
(i am giving 100 points)
History
2 answers:
Crazy boy [7]2 years ago
6 0

The case must be appealed to the federal courts; if they refuse to hear the appeal, the case cannot be reappeared.

What does a federal court do?

The Federal system of courts oversees matters concerning the United States Constitution and Federal laws, rules, and regulations. This is in distinction to the state court system, which has jurisdiction over matters concerning the laws, rules, and regulations of the individual states.

What cases does Federal Court hear?

The types of cases heard in the federal court are those in to which the US is directly involved. For example, cases with parties in the different states often qualify for federal court. Federal courts also hear cases pertaining to Constitutional law, maritime activity, and violations of federal laws. Only specific types of the criminal cases are eligible for the federal court.

Learn more about federal court here brainly.com/question/11293717

#SPJ10

Ivahew [28]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:B I got it right

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Governor rick perry’s record of failures and achievements as chief executive of the state show that governors do matter.
prohojiy [21]
True. Although there are many people who believe that governors are irrelevant and that the president more or less decides everything with the congress, it is incorrect and bad governors can make a lot of damage to the state that the federal government has to repair out of tax payers money later.
7 0
3 years ago
The percentage of the rocks on the earths surface that are sedimentary rocks is
pentagon [3]
<h3>the percentage of the rocks on the earths surface that are sedimentary rocks is</h3><h3 /><h2><em><u>75 percent</u></em></h2><h2 />

<em>Sedimentary rocks make up 75 percent of the rocks at the earth's surface but only 5percent of the outer 10 miles of the earth. Sediment, as distinguished fromsedimentary rock, is a collective name for loose, solid particles and is generally derived from weathering and erosion of preexisting rock</em>

hope it helps you ❤

7 0
3 years ago
24.<br> How was the issue of slavery dealt with in the Northwest Territory?
ozzi

Answer:

Explanation:

An Ordinance for the Government of the Territory of the United States, North-West of the River Ohio, 1787. Considered one of the most important legislative acts of the Confederation Congress, the Northwest Ordinance also protected civil liberties and outlawed slavery in the new territories. ...

7 0
3 years ago
Why did journalists call the Alaska purchase of 1867 “Seward’s Folly”?
Naily [24]
The imagined Alaska basically as a whole lot of land that is good for nothing. Although he got a good price in comparison, Alaska is huge and cost a lot of money. Just imagine what you think of the Arctic, then having the US pay one trillion dollars for it. Not great.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
3. Which of the following statements is not true regarding historians?
Bingel [31]

Answer:

It is not true that historians have the freedom to omit parts of evidence that they do not agree with.

Explanation:

Historians are academic professionals whose job is to collect events that occurred in the past, interpret them, and explain their development and consequences, including making connections between those events in the past and events in the present.

For this reason, historians cannot suppress content or events with which they do not agree, because if they did, they would be modifying the course of events and, therefore, reproducing an account of the events that would not coincide with reality.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What years did babe ruth play for official national baseball leauge?
    12·1 answer
  • How were chief black hawk and osceola,and what did they have in common
    8·1 answer
  • What are the different approaches that Luther and Erasmus had to reform the Catholic church?
    14·1 answer
  • What did Executive Order 9066 put into effect?
    10·2 answers
  • When did the “scramble for africa” begin??
    5·2 answers
  • Write a paragraph that explains the main reasons the United States joined the fighting in this world war. Evaluate the validity
    12·1 answer
  • 1. Congress, with the help of the President, can regulate trade.
    7·2 answers
  • How Long did the Ming Dynasty last?
    11·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE !!!:) Everyone in the North opposed slavery and fought against it.<br> True<br> False
    12·1 answer
  • Take one action that increases your pride. It could be related to your family, assets, culture,
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!