With the GDP per capita, this depends on the wealth and the population of a country. For somewhere such as the Arab Emirates, they have a small population, but a fair amount of wealth, so this then increases the GDP. The situation is similar with Kuwait. Iran has also been affected by War, meaning that some of the infrastructure will hav been destroyed, and that people would not be able to work and make money, which is then something that will have a direct impact on the GDP. With countries such as Jordan and Sudan, As far as I'm aware, they are relatively poor countries with a high population, meaning that the GDP will be lower and split between more people,therefore, meaning that it will be low. With regards to A). Iran is a country that has definitely been affected by this, following the war. B) A large majority of the countries that have been mentioned are also predominately desert, so where there is not people that are making money, this is something that is then not contributing to the GDP. Countries such as Kuwait and UAE also have large oil reserves, and this is something that can contribute to wealth hugely, and the smaller the population, the less people the GDP has to be spread between, and therefore, this increases it. With environmental disasters, these can have a huge impact, and the amount of money that is being made is also greatly reduced, and the expenditure is also increased, which is also something that can decrease the GDP.
Hope this helps you!
The major physical feature that you would have to cross in order to reach this destination would be the Appalachian Mountains, since these were so large that they discouraged travel to this region for quite some time. <span />
The Battles of Trenton and Princeton were important because they B) gave the Patriots confidence that victory was possible.
Answer:
La actividad de contrabando en América, se desarrolla a partir del siglo XVII como respuesta al llamado Monopolio Comercial Español. El contrabando por esa época consistía en el comercio y tráfico ilegal, sin que el tráfico fuera reportado o autorizado por las autoridades coloniales. Las fronteras del Imperio colonial español eran muy permeables, y las ciudades establecidas en suelo americano se convirtieron en potenciales clientes ávidos de los productos que desembarcaban desde barcos operados por europeos no españoles.12
Al respecto Guillermo Céspedes del Castillo indica que "el monopolio español cede ante el esfuerzo de sus importantes adversarios. A comienzos del siglo XVII son los extranjeros los principales beneficiarios del comercio de Indias en Sevilla; a través de testaferros españoles, más del 90% del capital y utilidades del tráfico entre América y el puerto andaluz pertenecen en realidad a franceses, genoveses, holandeses, ingleses y alemanes. ... En 1686, las flotas [españolas] surtían sólo en una tercera parte a los mercados indianos, que eran abastecidos en los restantes dos tercios por el contrabando".3
Explanation:
