Answer:
A. To provide advance notice that formal rule making may be forthcoming
Explanation:
The Rules/Regulations by the government do not always able to be accepted directly by the citizens.
When the government is expecting such situation they tend to use informal agency actions to prepare the citizens that a certain type of law might be coming in the future.
This provide two benefits for the government:
1. The government could gauge initial reaction from the public. If they sense that it potentially lead to massive riots, they can either cancel or postpone the decision.
2. It is aimed to make the citizens prepare themselves for the upcoming law.
Under Queen Elizabeth 1, the church of england was firmly established and both catholics & separatists were persec
<span>-He describes the extreme rituals that people hold in America which he introduces his topic, ritual activity, "the focus" of which is the human body, the appearance and health of which looms as a dominant concern in the ethos of the people.</span>
The statement is TRUE.
In 1951 Solomon Asch carried out the famous Conformity Experiments, set out to <u>measure the dynamics of group-thinking</u>. He presented his subjects with an extremely simple judgement task with a very obvious answer, joined by a previously prepared group that was told to answer incorrectly on purpose. By making it so simple, it would be clear that any subject that answered incorrectly would be doing it because of group pressure. With this first experiment, <u>Asch proved a correlation between a group's influence on an individual's conformity</u>.
Further trials went deeper into which factors were the most impactful to influence conformity. The results showed that <u>increasing group size</u> by up to three times, <u>raised the conformity levels to 32%</u>. However, larger groups did not impact this number. Applying group unanimity, on the other hand, showed an increase of as much as 80% on the conformity rates.
This clarified how much bigger of an influence unanimity was over group size, meaning it mattered more to an individual if an entire group agreed on something (even if the group was small), over a larger majority's opinion when a group was more split-up.
Hope this helps!
Working Through. Psychiatrist Mardi Horowitz divides the process of normal grief into "stages of loss and adaptation". During the "working through", people think about and feel their loss, but also start to figure out new ways to manage it (new ways of managing might include making preparations), engaging in new projects for example. As time goes by, the movement between not thinking about the loss and thinking about the loss tends to slow down (becomes less pronounced).
