1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
professor190 [17]
3 years ago
5

HELP ME OUT OVER HERE! THIS IS IMPORTANT FOR MY LEARNING. ITS THE MOST IMPORTANT QUESTION.

Law
2 answers:
Juliette [100K]3 years ago
7 0

The answers are legislative, executive, and judicial.

Naily [24]3 years ago
5 0

Anwers are Legislative, executive, judicial.

You might be interested in
People become trapped in an abusive relationship for many reasons.
Nonamiya [84]

Answer:

scared to leave, children in home, and money

4 0
2 years ago
Tools
valentinak56 [21]

Answer:

Explanation:

Appeal:

An appeal is the process of making a formal request to a higher (appellate) court to reverse a lower court’s decision after the lower court has made a final judgment or ruling. Often, the losing party files an appeal with the higher court; this begins the appellate review process. An appellate court reviews the facts as presented in the trial, and no other evidence is considered in making an appellate decision. The main purpose of an appeal is to review the legal decisions made at the trial court level.

Appellant:

An appellant is the party to a lawsuit who is seeking an appeal from a lower court decision. The appellant is typically the party who lost at the trial court level. The appellant must file a notice of appeal and offer a legal brief to the appellate court, putting forth its legal arguments and its legal basis for the appeal.

Appellee:

An appellee is the party who wins the judgment at the trial court level. The appellee must respond to the appellant’s legal arguments by filing a legal brief and appear in court, if necessary, to argue to the appellate court why the lower court decision should not be disturbed.

Harmless error:

Harmless error is an error allegedly made by a lower court judge that an appellate court finds insufficient to alter or amend the lower court’s decision. The error is deemed “harmless” because reconsideration of the alleged error would have no bearing on the outcome of the lower court’s decision. An example of a harmless error would be a technical error made by the lower court that, under the applicable law, was improperly decided; yet, the remaining evidence substantially supports the original judgment.

Injunction:

An injunction is an order issued by the court which orders a party to do something or prohibits the party from doing something. An injunction may be proper when a party may be harmed by another party’s threatened actions.

Interlocutory appeal:

An interlocutory appeal is a type of appeal that seeks the review of a temporary order (such as an injunction) that is related to a pending lawsuit. An interlocutory appeal is filed and heard while the underlying action is still proceeding at the trial court level.

Mandamus:

A mandamus action is an order issued by a court that orders a governmental body or public agency to perform an act required by law. Often, a mandamus action is sought when a governmental body or public agency fails or refuses to act under an applicable law.

Writ of certiorari:

A writ of certiorari is a type of judicial order from an upper level court to a lower court (for example, the U.S. Supreme Court to a U.S. Court of Appeal) to send the court record and related documents of a particular case to the higher court for its review. A writ of certiorari is typically associated with the review of lower court decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court or state supreme courts. The appealing party must file a writ of certiorari (also sometimes referred to in short hand as “cert”) to the higher court, which may agree to review the lower court's decision ("granting certiorari") or may refuse to review the lower court's decision ("denying certiorari").

4 0
2 years ago
Read this passage from the Articles of Confederation:
netineya [11]

Answer:

Making citizens of the states also citizens of the Union.

Explanation:

Through this passage, and specifically by establishing that all the free inhabitants of the states would enjoy the same rights in the other states in which they were not residents.

Thus, by guaranteeing a unity of rights throughout the territory of the Union, the Articles of Confederation sought to reaffirm the legal unity of all the states, in order to form not only a country with legal security for its inhabitants, but a nation with unified legal criteria at the government level.

7 0
2 years ago
How might the case of Gideon v. Wainwright affect the work of a prosecutor?
zhannawk [14.2K]

Answer:

b. Prosecutors need to watch the details guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, such as ensuring a speedy trial, impartial jury, informed of accusation, etc.

6 0
2 years ago
The four major speed laws are the basic speed law, prima favor speed law, the maximum speed law, and the _
BigorU [14]

Answer:

Minimum speed law

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does a traffic control officer do
    10·2 answers
  • in Philadelphia during the 1980s, white gamblers were forced to pay protection money to operate in the black neighborhoods. True
    11·1 answer
  • Should community service always fit the crime, or should these sentences be based on the needs of the community? Explain.
    9·2 answers
  • Jay is fired from his job and sues his employer. Jay loses the trial, and he appeals. The reviewing court affirms the decision o
    6·1 answer
  • What type of rock is formed from molten rock that has cooled and solidified?
    8·2 answers
  • Who's against gun control laws?
    8·1 answer
  • The type of law which deals with an individual's offenses against the state or federal government is called ____ law.
    13·1 answer
  • Why do banks practice fractional reserve banking?
    8·1 answer
  • ¿Cuáles son las dificultades con que tropiezan los indígenas en la actualidad? <br><br><br> Ayuda!!!
    10·1 answer
  • How many of the original thirteen states must ratify/approve the constitution for it to take effect?.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!