Answer:
-$5,500
Explanation:
The computation of the overall effect on the company net operating income is as follows:
New Variable cost per unit is
= $44 + $11
= $55
Now the new contribution margin per unit is
= $220 - $55
= $165
New unit Monthly sales is
= 7,000 units + 500 units
= 7,500
Now
New total contribution margin :
= 7,500 units × $165
= $1,237,500
And, the Current total contribution margin is
= 7,000 units × $176
= $1,232,000
So, the change would be
= $1,232,000 - $1,237,500
= -$5,500
In home replication strategy, knowledge flow is multi directional, while in transnational strategy, it is one-way. This statement is False.
The companies offer standardized products and exploit the parent companies knowledge through the world. Their key strategic capability basically is to transfer the home countries innovations worldwide.
An example can be taken from the German automotive industry, which uses a home replication strategy when entering new markets.
The businesses provide uniform products and make use of the parent firms' knowledge globally. Their primary strategic capability essentially consists of exporting domestic ideas to other countries.
The German auto sector, which employs a home replication strategy when entering new markets, serves as an illustration.
Hence, option B is correct.
To learn more about Strategy here
brainly.com/question/14286438
#SPJ4
Answer:
$10,200,000.
Explanation:
End inventory + Sales - Begin inventory = # of units that need to be produced
# of units that need to be produced @ $30 per = Your answer
<span>Bonds are actually a type of borrowing or loans most businesses and governments use. They represents an alternative to the common bank loans, however they enable loan of higher amounts of money, that governments need but ordinary banks are not able to provide.</span>
Answer: The answers are provided below
Explanation:
There are several similarities between the project management processes which surround scrum to the traditional project management processes which surrounds a project life cycle such as Waterfall. When one looks at each iteration as a project, one will see that Scrum planning meeting will be identical to planning meeting of the traditional project.
The daily standups in scrum will resemble the monitoring and the controlling of traditional waterfall with the exception that in scrum, its team monitors itself. A sprint would be the execution stage while the sprint review will be like project closure lessons that are learned. Sprint can be seen as small waterfall model project.
However, the main difference is in the scrum's team mindset versus the team of the traditional project management. Also, the process of work defining as being completed is different for the teams. Lastly, the method used by the scrum team in its approaches to work, team collaboration, responsibility acceptance, tasks definition and accountability are different from the traditional project management team.
A hybrid approach will be sensible in a large organization which has pockets of power. This is true for large retails that have old legacy systems in which frequent deployments aren't possible.
This is true for systems in which, testing can't be automated due to the fact that automated testing is a vital part for success for large scrum projects. In such organizations, it is sensible to use scrum for the teams which are able to move to scrum and waterfall can be used for other parts of the organization.
