1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SVETLANKA909090 [29]
1 year ago
12

A jar contains 18 jelly beans: 7 purple jelly beans, 3 green jelly beans, and 8 orange jelly beans. Without looking. Travis pick

s 1 jelly bean from the jar. What is the probability of each of the following outcomes? [ P(green) - 2 P(purple) 3 P(orange) - 4 P(not green) 5. P(purple or green) 6. P(not orange)​
Mathematics
1 answer:
aksik [14]1 year ago
7 0

Answer:

1/6, 7/18, 4/9, 5/6, 5/9, 5/9

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
3. A team of eye surgeons has developed a new technique for a risky eye operation to restore the
Zigmanuir [339]

Answer:

Yes the new method if sample size was less than 20 than that of old method or identical sample numbers of old and new the differences still prove the new operation is better. As 88 patients minus 1% still shows us 76.7475 significance of  old method being low point 67.5 = 30% of 225 and proved a 65.25 low point and 69.75 high point which is also a 20% jump to new methods low point significance.

You cna show this as workings to prove or follow any of the below statements.

Where new method of 88 patients -0.01 significance rate stands at 76.7475. This figure has reduced by 11.2525 from 88 patients to 76.7 we compare this to the old method if reversing significance we find  = 62.5 and it's 30% standing value of 67.5  as +1% increase shows us 31% = 69.7  ( 0.31 x 225 = 69.74)

Step-by-step explanation:

88/225  = 0.39111111111 = 39.11%%

P value 01 = 1%  =  225.225 or 5% range of alternative hypotheses.

To graph the P value we take the distance between the sample mean and the null hypothesis value (225 + 1% of sample - x nhv) = y ). We can graph the probability of obtaining a sample mean  (225 +/- ( x +1% of sample) where nhv has a decimal if needed to utilize the 1% added). we would replace nvp in this example with  Ha or H1 which means the alternative hypotheses as the data shows less than or equal to.

We can then show 225.225 -  Ha or H1  then graph the probability of obtaining a sample mean that is at least extreme in both tails  Ha or H1

However it would be the other way round where you take the first set of data and use the sample as the 30% significance of that sample indicates it may be a larger sample or a higher significance. Therefore this would be used in the graphing - 1%

We prove that 30-1 =29  where 29% of 225 = 225 x 0.29 = 65.25

this way we have proved that the new set of data being equal to 88 patients regaining their eyesight is <23 and can be written like this 65.25< x <88

This means that sample mean has taken the 1% to show on the graph we can show 225> 33.11 +1 .

We can prove that both indifference of significance would reduce when 1% is added and close based on being a higher percentage to begin with.

34.11 = 0.3411 x 225 = 76.7475 for second surgeon = 33.11% +1

Where as shown

30 = 0.3 x 225 = 67.5

76.5475 - 67.5 = 9.04 difference when comparing old method = +1%

where new method stands at 76.7475 has reduced by 11.2525 from 88 patients and where old method if reversing = 62.5 and has reduced from 67.5  as +1% and 31% = 69.7  ( 0.31 x 225 = 69.74)

You would therefore graph each higher methods first if comparing both by 0.01 or show 88 on graph and 76.7475 = +1%

NB/ if sample size was 20 more in the old data then 225+20 = 245 x 0.29 = 71.05 and would still be lower than new data. = 2.0 increase level of significance and not relevant unless you are looking for the decrease which means new is greater than 20% success than that of old method findings where 30% = 67.5.

5 0
3 years ago
3 1/2-2 5/9 subtract. Simplify if needed.
saw5 [17]

3 1/2-2 5/9= 0.94444444444


3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Oil consumption is increasing at a rate of 1.8% per year. by what factor will oil consumption increase inn 6 years? Use the appr
Vesna [10]
\frac{70}{1,8} \approx 38.8  \ \ \ \  \ \rightarrow \ the \ amount \ of \  time \ to \ double \ the \ consumption \\ \\&#10;38,8 - 100\% \\ 6 - x \\&#10;38,8 x = 600\% \\x \approx 15.5\% \\ \\&#10;In \ six \ years \ oil \ consumption \ will \ increase \ by \ approximately \ 15.5\%
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do I answer 3 and 4
RSB [31]

Answer:

yo have to think very hard about it

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following describes the scenario below?
Temka [501]
NznzjzjzbzbzbjzkzjsavsvbsjsjJJsbsvsvzzbnzjzjjjbsjksiskwjsbsbvszbziidksbebsbeksiqoqlqpqppqisjdndnnlcosjwbsbsqoqpoeiesudbnxnznlanckvkvlppqwkjdnxkxpspqijrfjncxnkdls
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Evaluate 6 + 4/a +<br> b/3 <br> when a = 4 and b = 3.
    13·1 answer
  • I dot know it please help
    11·2 answers
  • What is the proper fraction of 83.9999
    10·1 answer
  • A mathmatical expression for "the difference between 534 photos and 28 photos" is
    8·1 answer
  • Gase
    9·1 answer
  • The floor of the entryway to an office building will be triangular. Two angles of the triangle will measure 40º, and the side be
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement is a counterexample to the following conjecture?
    10·2 answers
  • Help me out plz I will gave u Brainliest
    9·1 answer
  • 1. What is the slope of the line 2x-3y=6? *
    8·1 answer
  • Astrid travels 130 km in 2 hours and then at 85 km/h for another 3 hours to reach her
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!