1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aleksandr-060686 [28]
2 years ago
7

Witch statement best describes a simularity between the two historians arguments.

History
1 answer:
makkiz [27]2 years ago
8 0

Option D. The similarity between the two arguments of these persons was that Both try to persuade the reader by only including details that support their arguments.

<h3>What is the argument of Historian A?</h3>

The historian is trying to state the reason that led to the revolution in America. According to him, it was due to the fact that the colonists were greedy.

He attributed it to stubbornness and disobedience to the tax laws of the English people.

<h3>What is the argument of Historian B?</h3>

This historian justified the revolution by blaming the British for the events that led to the revolution.

He put the blame on the British for the heavy tax laws they put on the colonists and for restricting their freedom and their liberty.

Each of these historians added the details that they felt are the best to help sway the opinion of the people reading the excerpts. Hence option D is correct.

<h3>Complete question</h3>

Read the views of two modern-day historians:

Historian A:

The American Revolution was caused by the American colonists' greedy desire for more money. They were simply tired of paying their fair share of taxes to the British government, even though British troops protected the colonies during the French and Indian War! Furthermore, their claims to be fighting for freedom and liberty are totally wrong. Many of the colonists still owned slaves at the time of the Revolution! The traitorous American colonists simply wanted to steal land that was already claimed by Great Britain.

Historian B:The American Revolution was completely justified due to Great Britain's repeated abuse of the colonists. The British passed enormous taxes on goods in the colonies, even though the Americans had no say in the British government. British soldiers were also allowed to live in American houses and eat common people's food without paying. During the Boston Massacre, British soldiers even fired their muskets into a crowd of civilians! Under such oppressive conditions, it's no wonder that the patriotic colonists would want to fight for the freedom and liberty of all people!

Which statement best describes a similarity between the two historians' arguments?

A.Both try to confuse the reader with unrelated details rather than making any strong claims.

B.Neither can be considered a credible source because they did not experience the American Revolution.

C.Neither uses any historical evidence to support his claims about the American Revolution.

D.Both try to persuade the reader by only including details that support their arguments.

Read more on the historian reports on the revolution  here: brainly.com/question/14027420

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Do any of y'all know what the articles of confederation is ?? Hallp pleasee
Oksana_A [137]

Congress felt the need for a stronger union and a government powerful enough to defeat Great Britain, so that's why they made The Articles of Confederation.

3 0
3 years ago
What is a secret ballot?
Bezzdna [24]

Answer: a ballot in which votes are cast in secret.(:)

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why claudette colvin's actions remain little known today​
timofeeve [1]

Answer:

Explanation:

The author feels that the activists of that time didn't feel like a teenager would be a good icon for a movement. So, Claudette Colvin's action still remain little known today.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I have to think of a question for this answer but I have no idea what to put. I'm learning about immigration in the 1800/1900s
mrs_skeptik [129]
Who's perspective do you think this is from?

that can be a good question
8 0
3 years ago
Witch empire established clonies along their trade routes in spain egypt italy and greece?
Serhud [2]
Pheonician empire is the correct answer.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Under the rule of the Convention, French women
    13·1 answer
  • What was the common purpose behind Jefferson Davis’s and Abraham Lincoln’s inaugural addresses?
    15·2 answers
  • "Which explains one way in which the Byzantine Empire continued the cultural traditions of the Romans?
    9·1 answer
  • Summarize the six unratified amendments by completing the chart below
    15·1 answer
  • Paul Revere displayed civic virtue by - *
    5·1 answer
  • n which case, policy, or situation did the motto “kill the Indian, but save the man” play an important role in western expansion
    12·2 answers
  • I need help with just a random parable anything you can think of it docent matter I just need a parable
    15·1 answer
  • W. e. b. du bois believed that african americans should
    12·2 answers
  • What does a bureaucracy gain from being established for a long time?
    5·1 answer
  • What are some of the reasons that people move from place to place?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!