Im pretty sure its two but you might wanna double check... let me know
Answer: 306.9
Step-by-step explanation: 3.1 x 11 = 34.1 x 9 = 306.9
SOLUTION:
To begin with, let's establish that the formula of this line is in slope-intercept form as follows:
y = mx
The formula for this line isn't:
y = mx + b
This is as this line doesn't have a y-intercept ( b ) as it passes through the origin instead. This means that ( b ) would be rendered useless in this formula as it would just bring us back to the y = mx formula as displayed below:
y = mx + b
y = mx + 0
y = mx
Moving on, for ( m ), we need to find the gradient of the line as displayed below:
m = gradient
m = rise / run
m = 10 / 2
m = 5
Now, we must simply substitue ( m ) into the formula in order to obtain the equation for this line as displayed below:
y = mx
y = 5x
Therefore, the answer is:
A. y = 5x
Answer:
From the graph attached, we know that 
by the corresponding angle theorem, this theorem is about all angles that derive form the intersection of one transversal line with a pair of parallels. Specifically, corresponding angles are those which are placed at the same side of the transversal, one interior to parallels, one exterior to parallels, like 
and 
.
We also know that, by definition of linear pair postulate, 
and are linear pair. Linear pair postulate is a math concept that defines two angles that are adjacent and for a straight angle, which is equal to 180°.
They are supplementary by the definition of supplementary angles. This definition states that angles which sum 180° are supplementary, and we found that and together are 180°, because they are on a straight angle. That is, 
If we substitute for , we have 
, which means that and are also supplementary by definition.
Y=1/9(-1)+4
Explanation:
X=-1 and y=8
