Answer:
Fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Step-by-step explanation:
People who live in Florida and also have annual pass to Disney world is 221, sample size selected for group 1 is 350.
People who do not live in Florida and have annual pass to Disney world is 365, sample size selected for Group 2 is 650.
Group 1 sample proportion is : 221 / 350 = 0.6314
Group 2 sample proportion is 365 / 650 = 0.5615
Test statistics is 0.8317
Since test stats value is greater than the sample proportion significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
R = { (x,y): 3x-y=0 }
The condition is 3x=y so that's not going to be any of these things.
R is reflexive if (x,x)∈R for all x. Let's check.
3x - y = 3x - x = 2x ≠ 0 necessarily. NOT REFLEXIVE
R is symmetric if (x,y)∈R → (y,x)∈R. Let's check.
(x,y)∈R so
3x-y = 0
y = 3x
Is (y,x)∈R. That would be true if 3y-x=0
3y - x = 3(3x) - x = 8x ≠ 0 necessarily NOT SYMMETRIC
R is transitive if (x,y)∈R and (y,z)∈R → (x,z)∈R. Let's check.
3x-y = 0 so y=3x
3y-z = 0 so z=3y = 9x
3x - z = 3x - 9x = -6x ≠ 0 necessarily NOT TRANSITIVE
Answer:
8
Step-by-step explanation:
2 : 4
8 : 16
A: the formula would be f(x) = P(R) ^T or f(x) = Principle(rate)^time
B: f(x) = 20,000(0.85)^5
C: = 8,874.10625
D: Yes, the final answer makes sense compared to the origional cost of the car in relation to the formula. As well, time decreases the value of a car, so for the cost to be so low only makes sense due to the cars decrease in value or an extended and elongated amount of time.
E: You can solve this equation graphically by plotting th point at 20,000 and then taking 85% of 20,000 and plotting it each time until you get to the fifth year.
