The rate of violent hate crime in 2005 was less than the rate of violent crime in 2019.
<h3>Comparing the rates of violent hate crime across the years. </h3>
- Violent hate crime was at a rate of just over 0.8% in 2005.
- In 2019, this had risen to a rate of 1%.
This comparison is not surprising because there had been a downward trend in violent hate crime but this began to rise in 2016 till it reached the rate of 1.0% in 2019.
<h3>Motivations and perpetrators of those hate crimes </h3>
- Motivated by race and ethnicity.
- Perpetrated by far right activists.
With the election of Donald Trump, far right activists gained renewed momentum as they felt he was on their side. As a result, they increased their tendency to engage in violent hate crime.
Find out more on far right activists at brainly.com/question/511410.
Answer:
NO
Explanation:
Al-Dabagh, a dermatologist, was said to have completed all the academic requirements at Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) for him to become a medical doctor. They school did not give him the required certificate with series of cases brought against him for being unprofessional in his conducts.
Many times, he was found late, and that delayed the classes on several occasions. There are also times he was said to have put up inappropriate acts with some girls in his class and in another incidence, it was said that he rode on a cab and refused to pay afterwards. Though he denied all these, but that did not convince the university to shift ground.
There was a trial court judgment that he should be given the certificate he merited. CWRU decided to appeal the case further and the supreme court reversed the judgement made by the trial court, reaffirming the stance of the university.
Answer:
first pic (with calculator pic on it)
1) 45
2) 32
second pic (with paperclip on it)
1) 30
2) 24
3rd pic (with scissors on it)
1) 30
2) 18
Explanation:
Answer:
It means that the best way to pull an economy out of a recession is for the government to increase demand by infusing the economy with capital—by spending, in short. If it has to borrow money—go into debt and increase the deficit—to do so, it should.
Explanation:
Answer:
no
Explanation:
no the shouldnt because what they did was completely wrong and they cant be trusted not to do it again
