Answer:
In Griffin v. California, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination not only allows a criminal defendant to refuse to take the witness stand during his trial, but it also bars the prosecutor from urging the jury to interpret that silence as an indication that the defendant has something to hide. The Court reasons that the right against self-incrimination would be meaningless if a defendant’s exercise of the right could be used against him.
Hope this helps
Answer:
Explanation:
just try your best to answer their questions and state some things that you saw.
This law is unlikely to be constitutional.
The Miranda warning is a type of notification that is given to criminal suspects who are in custody. This warning advises them of their right to remain silent, and that they are allowed to refuse answering questions or providing information to authorities. A case precedent that would support this instance is <em>Berkemer v. McCarty (1984)</em>. In this case, it was established that a person stopped, even for a misdemeanour, should receive the protections of the Fifth Amendment once in custody, regardless of how serious the offense is.
No, you need to make a stop at all times if you have a stop sign.
