The assessed value of a condominium is usually higher than a similar <u>Cooperative</u> because of outright ownership.
This is because a cooperative's assessed value is often lower than a condominium's because cooperatives are not owned outright.
In a condominium, each unit within a larger complex is sold, as opposed to being rented out. These apartments, townhomes, or even commercial warehouses may have undergone renovation. Contrary to common misconception, the term "condominium" refers to the legal ownership structure rather than the specific sort of unit. Any building with several units has the option to "become condominium," which requires tenants to leave the property or buy their apartments outright. The walls of a condominium are theoretically owned by the people who buy
To learn more about Cooperatives here
brainly.com/question/28336069
#SPJ4
Answer:
Correct option is (e)
Explanation:
Programmed decisions are those that are planned decisions for routine situations. These decisions are made based on tried and tested methods or standardized procedures. These decisions are made once when situation arises, and subsequently becomes a procedure when similar situations arise in future. Some examples are dealing with labor absenteeism, terminating an employee or re-ordering supplies.
Non programmed decisions are distinctive. They are not based on any past situation. They are mostly taken by upper management using logic or intuition. They do not arise in normal course of business. One such decision is related to developing new product or service. It is not a routine situation. As, such it is an example of non programmed decision. Rest of the options are examples of programmed decision.
Answer:
Option B. He will win
Explanation:
If Samuel is desiring to sue his employer in a circuit court because he thinks that the employer was negligent then he will have to sue under negligence Act, which says that the employer is obliged to take all necessary precautions and if found negligent then the court may apply contributory negligent theory as well as comparative negligent theory. These two negligent theories means that the employer was partly responsible for injury, which means that this would result in compensation to Samuel.
Hence it is more likely that Samuel will win the case.
