Answer:Efforts were made in Maryland, Kentucky, and Oklahoma. Their actions were designed to thwart the objective of the Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, ratified in 1870, which prohibited states from depriving voters of their voting rights on the basis of race.
Explanation:
Answer:
Option. A
Explanation:
A special interest ,is a type of interest that favours especially a different or special group , they are this interest that imposes a particular law just because of there own interest. It involves influencing the legislators to make a particular decision that will favour them. It is special because such decision interest only that special group.
Answer:
The answer is a positive correlation.
Explanation:
A positive correlation is found when the two statistical variables go in the same direction. In other words, there is a more = more or a less = less relationship.
In the example, <u>more poverty = more crime</u>. It's important to recognise that correlation is not the same as causation. The factors are related, but there is no solid cause-effect relationship.
Answer:
B). A Cross-sectional research design.
Explanation:
A cross-sectional research design is demonstrated as a kind of observation study that involves the study and analysis of a representative subset from the population at a particular point of time.
In the given example, Tucker is employing 'cross-sectional research design' as he selects a representative subset('a group of 5-year-olds, a group of 10-year-olds, and a group of 15-year old) from the population at the same time for study and analysis(by interviewing them) . This implies that Tucker adopts a '<u>cross-sectional research design</u>.'
<h3>
Answer: A. competition among producers</h3>
==========================================================
Explanation:
Competition reduces prices while also increasing the quality of the product or service. Companies that don't do such things will likely be out of business since the customer can go elsewhere for a better experience. The more competition, the better consumers are off.
In contrast, monopolies are bad for consumers because one company can set the price to whatever they want (to a certain level of course) and the customer has no choice to pay that price. The customer does not have any other option so the company is in full control. This leads to decline in quality because quality is often associated with cost. Safety standards may decline as well. So this is why monopolies are not good for the customer. In cases where there are monopolies, such as with power utilities, it is strongly advised that government regulations are put in place. This way the company doesn't completely exploit the customer.
In short, we can eliminate choice D because it runs counter to choice A.
Choice C can also be eliminated because if you had a decrease in supply, then the price of the product is likely to go up if you hold other factors in check (such as keeping the same level of demand). Higher prices do not benefit consumers unless those consumers had an equal or better wage increase.
A raise in interest rates means that it becomes more expensive to borrow money. For example, a raise in interest rates means that mortgage rates go higher. This negative is slightly counterbalanced with the fact that savings accounts interest rates go up as well. Overall, I think a rise in interest rates means that consumers ultimately pay more, so we can cross choice B off the list as well.
